Climate Change Misinformation: Tracing the Funding to Greedy People

Climate change misinformation has been a persistent issue for decades, fueled by campaigns funded by the fossil fuel industry. In this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, host Andrew Lewin discusses the ongoing struggle to raise awareness...
Climate change misinformation has been a persistent issue for decades, fueled by campaigns funded by the fossil fuel industry. In this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, host Andrew Lewin discusses the ongoing struggle to raise awareness about climate change and the detrimental effects of misinformation on public perception and policy. He highlights a recent article from The Cool Down that reveals how organizations are financially supported to spread false narratives and apathy regarding climate change.
Andrew reflects on historical examples, such as the successful efforts to address the ozone layer and acid rain, contrasting them with the current challenges posed by climate change denial and misinformation. He emphasizes the importance of recognizing the role of influential figures and organizations, like the Koch brothers, in perpetuating these misleading narratives.
As the episode unfolds, Andrew calls for action against climate change misinformation and encourages listeners to be informed voters, especially in light of upcoming elections. He stresses the need for transparency in political funding and urges individuals to support candidates who prioritize environmental issues over corporate interests. Join Andrew as he navigates the complexities of climate change communication and advocates for a more informed and proactive approach to protecting our planet.
Link to article: https://www.thecooldown.com/green-business/climate-disinformation-donors-report-fossil-fuel-philanthropy/
Sign Up for Updates on the process: www.speakupforblue.com/oceanapp
Connect with Speak Up For Blue:
Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf
Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc
YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube
00:00:00,188 --> 00:00:03,849
For almost half a century, we have been trying to
2
00:00:04,129 --> 00:00:07,790
talk about climate change and make sure that people are aware that
3
00:00:07,850 --> 00:00:11,072
the climate is changing and the consequences that come along with that.
4
00:00:11,572 --> 00:00:15,753
But over those 50 years, we have seen a series
5
00:00:16,093 --> 00:00:20,114
of campaigns that feel relentless against
6
00:00:20,174 --> 00:00:23,355
scientists, against conservationists, against people who are
7
00:00:23,395 --> 00:00:26,757
trying to make sure that everybody, you and I, know
8
00:00:26,957 --> 00:00:30,118
about what the what climate change will bring to us.
9
00:00:30,918 --> 00:00:34,881
And it's funded by people who have investments
10
00:00:35,081 --> 00:00:38,462
in oil. We've been talking about this for, like I said, half a
11
00:00:38,683 --> 00:00:41,884
century. But the people who have been funding this have been getting away
12
00:00:41,944 --> 00:00:45,386
with it, even though we kind of knew who they were. There's an article that's
13
00:00:45,406 --> 00:00:48,748
now posted that shows what people and
14
00:00:48,808 --> 00:00:51,970
what companies are donating to these campaigns and
15
00:00:52,130 --> 00:00:55,932
why they benefit from the fossil fuel industry.
16
00:00:56,312 --> 00:00:59,574
And today we're going to be talking about the frustrations that I felt and
17
00:00:59,694 --> 00:01:03,176
other people have felt about climate change and why people just aren't getting
18
00:01:03,236 --> 00:01:06,439
it. And now we even see even now to this day where we
19
00:01:06,559 --> 00:01:09,641
see the consequences that people are continue to, you
20
00:01:10,321 --> 00:01:13,623
know, speak out against it and make sure that we
21
00:01:13,683 --> 00:01:17,205
can't do any more progress from a government standpoint as
22
00:01:17,265 --> 00:01:21,088
much as we need to do because of these misinformation
23
00:01:21,148 --> 00:01:24,770
campaigns. So we're going to talk about that on today's episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast.
24
00:01:25,170 --> 00:01:30,497
Let's start the show. Hey
25
00:01:30,517 --> 00:01:33,879
everybody, welcome back to another exciting episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast.
26
00:01:33,980 --> 00:01:37,242
I'm your host, Andrew Lewin, and this is a podcast where you find out what's happening with the ocean,
27
00:01:37,542 --> 00:01:40,604
how you can speak up for the ocean, and what you can do to live for a
28
00:01:40,644 --> 00:01:44,007
better ocean by taking action. And if you're new
29
00:01:44,067 --> 00:01:47,489
here, don't worry, you're in the right place. place if you want to know about
30
00:01:47,669 --> 00:01:51,212
ocean news you want to know about what's happening with the ocean you want to know how you can protect
31
00:01:51,252 --> 00:01:54,694
the ocean this is the resource for you not only on this podcast but
32
00:01:54,714 --> 00:02:00,038
you can head over to our website at www.speakupforblue.com and
33
00:02:00,118 --> 00:02:03,901
even more if you want to get information to your email
34
00:02:04,221 --> 00:02:07,383
Monday to Friday every morning You can find out
35
00:02:07,443 --> 00:02:11,064
not only about what's happening in the latest news, but you can find out our latest information
36
00:02:11,084 --> 00:02:14,485
that we provide on our podcasts and our YouTube videos, as well
37
00:02:14,725 --> 00:02:18,166
as you can find out if you're looking to start a career in ocean
38
00:02:18,186 --> 00:02:21,547
conservation, you can get three jobs every day, Monday to
39
00:02:21,587 --> 00:02:25,187
Friday, right to your email. So yeah, that's
40
00:02:25,247 --> 00:02:28,388
essentially it. If you want to get access to that, go to
41
00:02:28,448 --> 00:02:31,669
speakupforblue.com forward slash newsletter. That's
42
00:02:31,709 --> 00:02:35,030
speakupforblue.com forward slash newsletter. Let's
43
00:02:35,090 --> 00:02:38,452
get into the episode. There is one of my new of
44
00:02:38,572 --> 00:02:41,635
this article that I was talking about earlier about how there are
45
00:02:41,716 --> 00:02:45,139
organizations that funded That were funded to spread
46
00:02:45,219 --> 00:02:48,643
lies to the public This
47
00:02:48,803 --> 00:02:52,607
article came from a new a new website that I really love called the cooldown
48
00:02:52,647 --> 00:02:55,811
calm It's all about just sort of ways that we can help in
49
00:02:55,851 --> 00:02:59,314
terms of dealing with climate change. It has like business, auto tech,
50
00:02:59,454 --> 00:03:02,535
outdoors, all this kind of stuff. And this is in the business section. I'm going to
51
00:03:02,575 --> 00:03:05,797
link to the article in the show notes or the description wherever you're watching.
52
00:03:05,817 --> 00:03:09,319
If you're watching on YouTube, it's in the description below. But
53
00:03:09,399 --> 00:03:12,781
check it out. Check out the site. Check out this article. It's a really interesting article
54
00:03:12,821 --> 00:03:16,242
that leads to a different article, which I'm actually going to highlight
55
00:03:16,683 --> 00:03:20,184
in the show notes because it's an article that will actually show
56
00:03:20,585 --> 00:03:24,469
the report, the fossil fuel philanthropy report. basically saying
57
00:03:24,489 --> 00:03:28,580
that there are companies and organizations, non-profit organizations,
58
00:03:28,681 --> 00:03:32,738
like organizations who get a tax rebate. that
59
00:03:32,898 --> 00:03:36,602
are getting funded to spread lies. Not
60
00:03:36,642 --> 00:03:40,585
only just lies, but to spread apathy. So I'll
61
00:03:40,605 --> 00:03:44,069
take you back to a time where people started
62
00:03:44,089 --> 00:03:47,552
to talk about climate change. Scientists were starting to make people know. You saw
63
00:03:47,992 --> 00:03:51,395
scientists make people know about the ozone layer.
64
00:03:51,415 --> 00:03:54,778
They said, hey, you know what? There's a hole in the ozone layer, and this is what's causing it.
65
00:03:55,018 --> 00:03:58,342
It's like a bunch of CFCs. and if i was an 80s i
66
00:03:58,362 --> 00:04:02,468
was a 70s baby i grew up in the 80s and 90s and i remember watching
67
00:04:02,648 --> 00:04:05,952
shows like cartoons like gi joe kind of stuff
68
00:04:06,433 --> 00:04:09,857
and gi joe used to have this little thing at the end it
69
00:04:09,897 --> 00:04:13,214
was like a little segment called the more you know and
70
00:04:13,294 --> 00:04:16,537
or knowing is half the battle I think is is is what it was more you
71
00:04:16,557 --> 00:04:20,041
know is NBC thing but knowing is half the battle was
72
00:04:20,081 --> 00:04:23,364
a G. I. Joe kind of saying and it basically talk is about a variety different
73
00:04:23,384 --> 00:04:27,207
things don't take candy from strangers know how to call 911 and
74
00:04:27,288 --> 00:04:30,810
who's a friend who's not all this kind of stuff But they also
75
00:04:31,511 --> 00:04:34,572
talked about the ozone layer and how the ozone layer, actually I think it
76
00:04:34,613 --> 00:04:38,455
was one of the episodes was about the ozone layer, how there's like CFCs
77
00:04:39,155 --> 00:04:42,477
in aerosol cans that was causing the
78
00:04:42,537 --> 00:04:47,019
hole in the ozone layer. So back then, in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, We're
79
00:04:47,059 --> 00:04:50,601
like, oh, OK, so there's a hole in the ozone layer and it's caused by
80
00:04:50,661 --> 00:04:53,763
these CFCs. So governments got together and said, you know what? Not
81
00:04:53,803 --> 00:04:57,204
only do we have to stop buying these aerosol cans, but we have to stop putting
82
00:04:57,284 --> 00:05:00,706
CFCs in these aerosol cans. So basically put the
83
00:05:01,227 --> 00:05:04,368
element or the chemical that was causing the hole in the ozone layer, we
84
00:05:04,388 --> 00:05:07,690
need to stop putting that in the aerosol cans because that's what the scientists are saying is
85
00:05:07,710 --> 00:05:10,932
it's causing the hole in the ozone layer. And they did that. They
86
00:05:10,992 --> 00:05:14,614
actually took it out. And so aerosol cans didn't have that. And hey,
87
00:05:14,654 --> 00:05:18,395
guess what? The hole in the ozone layer got smaller, right?
88
00:05:18,975 --> 00:05:22,796
There you go. Scientists identify the problem. The policy
89
00:05:22,876 --> 00:05:26,117
goes in for the government. People are like, yeah, we can't do this.
90
00:05:26,177 --> 00:05:29,578
Let's listen to the scientists. OK, let's put into policies,
91
00:05:29,618 --> 00:05:34,159
put into regulation, and businesses stop putting it in there. Perfect.
92
00:05:34,339 --> 00:05:37,700
Problem pretty much solved. It closed. It's opened again,
93
00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:41,154
but for a different reason. But now, in
94
00:05:41,575 --> 00:05:45,018
the 80s, we had acid rain. So basically, the chemicals that were going into
95
00:05:45,038 --> 00:05:48,161
the atmosphere from a variety of different things, a lot of it had
96
00:05:48,181 --> 00:05:51,424
to do with mining. Because I remember in Sudbury, Ontario, near where
97
00:05:51,525 --> 00:05:55,248
I live, just north of where I live, like four hours, five hours north, there
98
00:05:55,268 --> 00:05:58,450
was acid rain. So what was happening is there was chemicals that were getting the air
99
00:05:58,490 --> 00:06:01,852
from, I believe it was from mining, if I remember correctly. And then it
100
00:06:02,012 --> 00:06:05,615
made the rain more acidic and it was causing devastation
101
00:06:05,675 --> 00:06:08,917
to the environment. So scientists identified that,
102
00:06:08,997 --> 00:06:12,179
governments got together and said, hey, you know what? We should stop this. So let's
103
00:06:12,219 --> 00:06:15,661
put on regulations of what was causing it and let's stop acid
104
00:06:15,681 --> 00:06:18,943
rain. Acid rain went down. We don't hear about acid rain again because it's
105
00:06:18,983 --> 00:06:22,825
not that much of a problem as it was back in the 80s and 90s. And
106
00:06:22,885 --> 00:06:26,086
now, because scientists identified it, that's great. Now,
107
00:06:26,186 --> 00:06:29,606
come to climate change. In the 70s, scientists started to talk about climate
108
00:06:29,626 --> 00:06:33,007
change. 80s, 90s, we're starting to say, hey, you know what? We really
109
00:06:33,047 --> 00:06:36,387
need to look out for this because it's getting worse. And it's caused by
110
00:06:36,427 --> 00:06:39,528
the chemicals that are put out for the fossil, the burning fossil fuels. So
111
00:06:39,548 --> 00:06:43,269
you're looking at carbon dioxide. You're looking at methane gas
112
00:06:43,309 --> 00:06:47,369
and other greenhouse gases that were warming the atmosphere and
113
00:06:47,409 --> 00:06:50,770
that was causing changes and shifts in the environment. So it was warming
114
00:06:50,790 --> 00:06:54,351
the waters. It was causing the water to be more acidic,
115
00:06:54,931 --> 00:06:58,092
right? And it was causing a lot of sea level to rise. It was causing the
116
00:06:58,312 --> 00:07:01,593
glaciers to melt. But all of a sudden, there
117
00:07:01,613 --> 00:07:05,614
started to be information being like trying to get rid of that information, right?
118
00:07:05,754 --> 00:07:08,995
Trying to combat that information. Be like, no, no, scientists are just
119
00:07:09,055 --> 00:07:12,297
being This is a bunch of hippies that are doing that are saying this and
120
00:07:12,317 --> 00:07:15,519
they want us to stop it We don't really need to stop. It's okay. We could
121
00:07:15,539 --> 00:07:18,641
just continue don't believe in climate change climate change is not a
122
00:07:18,681 --> 00:07:21,964
thing That was the messaging all throughout the 90s and probably most of
123
00:07:22,004 --> 00:07:25,786
the 2000s that we've had so far And it wasn't until
124
00:07:25,866 --> 00:07:29,029
recently the like last 10 years where we started to see
125
00:07:29,069 --> 00:07:32,536
campaigns be like, you know what? Like climate change is here. Yes,
126
00:07:32,857 --> 00:07:36,100
it's it's here like it's cause and it's a little bit caused by humans actually for
127
00:07:36,140 --> 00:07:39,343
a while. They used to say I remember all man. I remember this was like I
128
00:07:39,383 --> 00:07:43,187
think it was like in the late 90s or early 2000s. It
129
00:07:43,227 --> 00:07:46,591
was a senator. I think was Ted Cruz that went on like David
130
00:07:46,631 --> 00:07:49,833
Letterman and And he basically told David Letterman,
131
00:07:49,853 --> 00:07:53,334
because they were talking about climate change and how the atmosphere was warming. And
132
00:07:53,354 --> 00:07:57,216
he's like, yes, we had a peak in 1998. And
133
00:07:57,256 --> 00:08:00,437
if you look at the rest of the time after that,
134
00:08:00,477 --> 00:08:04,429
we haven't had temperatures higher than that. Right.
135
00:08:04,449 --> 00:08:08,070
So we've only peaked and now we're going down. That's basically what he said on national
136
00:08:08,150 --> 00:08:11,811
TV. But if you looked at the entire graph,
137
00:08:11,951 --> 00:08:15,111
like from the 50s and 60s, even earlier, you start to
138
00:08:15,212 --> 00:08:18,452
see this exponential growth. And yes, there was a
139
00:08:18,552 --> 00:08:21,673
slight peak in 1998 and it did go down a
140
00:08:21,713 --> 00:08:25,174
little bit, but it was slowly starting to rise again each
141
00:08:25,234 --> 00:08:28,955
year, year after year after year. And it continued to
142
00:08:29,035 --> 00:08:32,696
rise and it continues to rise. And so when you have
143
00:08:33,277 --> 00:08:36,419
people saying, oh, yeah, well, it peaked, but now it's going down, people are like,
144
00:08:36,539 --> 00:08:40,581
oh, that makes sense. Like, there's this guy on TV who said it peaks and it goes down. But
145
00:08:40,621 --> 00:08:43,823
when you look at the actual graph and you take it into full context, you
146
00:08:43,843 --> 00:08:47,245
start to see, like, actually, it's slowly rising again. And
147
00:08:47,265 --> 00:08:50,947
we're still very high compared to where we were 50 years
148
00:08:51,008 --> 00:08:54,490
ago, even longer, like 100 years ago. Very, very different.
149
00:08:55,350 --> 00:09:00,153
So they're just looking at minuscule in a small period of time, but
150
00:09:00,193 --> 00:09:03,434
we had to say the peak. And I remember talking to people. I was in university at
151
00:09:03,474 --> 00:09:06,796
this point, learning about climate change, learning about how it affects the ocean.
152
00:09:07,416 --> 00:09:11,599
But still, you didn't see or hear a lot of talk. But you hear the denial. I started to really sort
153
00:09:11,639 --> 00:09:14,880
of realize how many people were denying climate change on
154
00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:18,262
TV, in conversations. And I remember talking to
155
00:09:18,282 --> 00:09:21,336
my dad about this. And my brother and I
156
00:09:21,356 --> 00:09:24,697
was like, yeah, I'm like, look, climate change is a big thing. We have to be careful of
157
00:09:24,737 --> 00:09:27,918
it. We've got to change the way we live. It's a big, big
158
00:09:27,978 --> 00:09:31,259
change. Because it was fossil fuels. We were relying on fossil fuels
159
00:09:31,719 --> 00:09:35,260
so much at that point. We were barely going to windmills, barely
160
00:09:35,300 --> 00:09:38,841
going to solar. That was being talked about like, it can't sustain
161
00:09:39,021 --> 00:09:42,202
anything. The technology is not there yet, all that kind of stuff. This is late
162
00:09:42,222 --> 00:09:45,343
90s, early 2000s. And I remember talking to my dad about it. He's like,
163
00:09:45,363 --> 00:09:48,444
well, we've got to be careful. We can't just change everything because the economy is
164
00:09:48,484 --> 00:09:51,705
dependent, especially in Canada, is dependent on fossil fuels. And it is. It
165
00:09:51,745 --> 00:09:55,126
is tied to oil and gas. That's what our economy is tied to. If
166
00:09:56,287 --> 00:09:59,548
the oil goes down, the price of oil goes down, our economy goes
167
00:09:59,588 --> 00:10:02,809
down because we're so focused on natural resources, especially oil and
168
00:10:02,849 --> 00:10:06,231
gas. Regardless of that, that deniability just
169
00:10:06,271 --> 00:10:10,672
kept coming into play. And then we started to hear the apathy, basically
170
00:10:10,752 --> 00:10:14,035
saying, hey, you know what? Yes, climate change is here. We
171
00:10:14,135 --> 00:10:17,298
recognize that the climate is changing. Then they're saying, but it's not
172
00:10:17,338 --> 00:10:20,521
by us. Climate just changes over like a lot
173
00:10:20,561 --> 00:10:24,084
of time over the time period. And it's just a natural thing. We saw ebbs
174
00:10:24,164 --> 00:10:27,688
and flows in over time. And we just saw that we
175
00:10:27,708 --> 00:10:31,211
don't have to worry about it. It's not human related. Then, you know,
176
00:10:31,251 --> 00:10:34,475
more evidence comes out that it's human-related and more and more people are believing that.
177
00:10:34,855 --> 00:10:38,239
And then they start to say, you know what, sure, it's here. I think
178
00:10:38,279 --> 00:10:41,542
now it's like, we just can't do anything about it. It's just the earth. The
179
00:10:41,642 --> 00:10:45,847
earth is just changes. Yes, so we make a little bit of a minuscule disturbance.
180
00:10:46,368 --> 00:10:49,691
We just can't do anything about it. You might as well just enjoy the ride and
181
00:10:49,711 --> 00:10:53,515
let's just see what happens. And over this time, we
182
00:10:53,595 --> 00:10:56,916
keep continuing to reveal that there are companies out
183
00:10:56,976 --> 00:11:00,717
there who are spending money to PR firms, who
184
00:11:00,758 --> 00:11:04,379
are spending money on non-profit organizations like the Fraser Institute
185
00:11:04,399 --> 00:11:08,120
here in Canada, to proliferate all this garbage
186
00:11:08,220 --> 00:11:11,462
science that says, hey, you know what, we have so many science, hundreds
187
00:11:11,502 --> 00:11:14,943
of scientists have signed on saying climate change doesn't exist. Not true.
188
00:11:15,023 --> 00:11:18,624
If you actually scour and look at the peer-reviewed journal articles
189
00:11:18,724 --> 00:11:21,985
where the science happens, Like where all, everything
190
00:11:22,045 --> 00:11:25,666
is agreed upon and debated on, and
191
00:11:25,686 --> 00:11:29,107
you know, there's rivalries and stuff like that. You
192
00:11:29,127 --> 00:11:33,249
see a lot happening, a lot of critique about science
193
00:11:33,449 --> 00:11:36,650
in the peer-reviewed journals. You see it. Not only just, you know,
194
00:11:37,030 --> 00:11:40,411
journals, journal articles of science that are saying that yes, climate change
195
00:11:40,451 --> 00:11:43,852
is getting worse, and we're still here, and you know, even if we stop
196
00:11:43,952 --> 00:11:47,173
everything now, we're still gonna feel it for like the next 50 to
197
00:11:47,293 --> 00:11:50,785
100 years. All that's in there, but there's also
198
00:11:51,145 --> 00:11:54,927
a lot of scientists that are just talking about climate change in general. They
199
00:11:54,967 --> 00:11:58,549
may not be focused, their study may not be focused on climate change, but
200
00:11:58,910 --> 00:12:02,472
overall, there is climate change. It's in
201
00:12:02,512 --> 00:12:05,633
there, just like, oh yeah, and climate change is affecting this, so it's a cumulative effect on a
202
00:12:05,693 --> 00:12:09,716
disturbance for nutrients or whatever. There's always that added factor. Scientists
203
00:12:09,756 --> 00:12:13,018
continue to sort of
204
00:12:13,938 --> 00:12:18,147
enforce the fact that climate change changes everything. Climate
205
00:12:18,167 --> 00:12:22,390
change changes everything. And when the United States had Obama as
206
00:12:22,510 --> 00:12:26,152
their president, Obama came out and said, climate
207
00:12:26,172 --> 00:12:30,034
change is the number one threat to the US. And then the Navy came
208
00:12:30,094 --> 00:12:33,396
out and said, climate change is the number one threat to the US. And
209
00:12:33,436 --> 00:12:36,618
then NASA came out and said, climate change is the number one threat to the
210
00:12:36,718 --> 00:12:40,200
US. You had all these people coming out and saying it that were backed by
211
00:12:40,300 --> 00:12:43,636
science. And then all of a sudden that messaging disappeared because
212
00:12:43,656 --> 00:12:46,958
you had another president who came in who was just basically all
213
00:12:47,018 --> 00:12:50,701
for drilling oil and gas and continuing to
214
00:12:50,781 --> 00:12:54,063
move that. Even with the other president, Joe Biden coming in,
215
00:12:54,463 --> 00:12:58,226
still saying, hey, we need to put this plan together about climate change
216
00:12:58,606 --> 00:13:01,828
and to reduce climate change, still approving projects for
217
00:13:01,928 --> 00:13:05,550
oil and gas that will continue to develop oil and gas reserves
218
00:13:05,570 --> 00:13:11,063
well into the future, like 30, 40, 50 years into the future. And
219
00:13:11,103 --> 00:13:14,488
it's just perpetuated by this misinformation that we keep
220
00:13:14,528 --> 00:13:18,408
seeing. Every time, and a lot of my fellow science communicators
221
00:13:18,608 --> 00:13:21,968
will be able to attest to this. A lot of times, and for
222
00:13:22,008 --> 00:13:25,449
me, it's like every time I talk about climate change, there is somebody who's
223
00:13:25,469 --> 00:13:28,750
gonna write a comment that denies climate change. And the best,
224
00:13:28,790 --> 00:13:32,311
my favorite is like, watch this YouTube video. This YouTube video will
225
00:13:32,371 --> 00:13:36,712
tear every scientist that has
226
00:13:36,752 --> 00:13:40,253
talked about climate change, how it's affecting the world. It's gonna tear them down, all
227
00:13:40,293 --> 00:13:43,954
the arguments are gonna be torn down. Forget the peer-reviewed scientists. Just
228
00:13:44,074 --> 00:13:47,496
listen to this YouTube person and I Fully
229
00:13:47,556 --> 00:13:50,838
aware that I am a person who's listening to you Who's telling you on YouTube
230
00:13:50,858 --> 00:13:54,019
that climate change is real and we're facing the consequences. I understand that
231
00:13:54,299 --> 00:13:57,481
but I'm backed by peer-reviewed science I'm backed by all
232
00:13:57,521 --> 00:14:01,063
those scientists who are saying hey, we have a problem here.
233
00:14:01,663 --> 00:14:04,885
That's affecting our entire planet now
234
00:14:05,685 --> 00:14:08,807
Not in the future, but now it's gonna get worse if we continue on this
235
00:14:08,847 --> 00:14:12,758
path, but now we are being affected But
236
00:14:12,778 --> 00:14:16,504
then you continue to have these ideas by high-level
237
00:14:16,544 --> 00:14:20,049
officials in government who continue to say, hey, the
238
00:14:20,089 --> 00:14:23,554
weather's being controlled by the government to stop an election
239
00:14:23,594 --> 00:14:27,316
from happening that will go the opposite way. You
240
00:14:27,396 --> 00:14:31,039
have people who are out there, like these organizations that
241
00:14:31,079 --> 00:14:34,741
are being funded by oil and gas through
242
00:14:34,801 --> 00:14:37,963
non-profit organizations. It's almost like laundering money in a way, but I
243
00:14:38,003 --> 00:14:41,085
don't know if this is illegal. But you're starting to have this, like the
244
00:14:41,145 --> 00:14:44,368
Koch brothers are the ones that are a part of
245
00:14:44,388 --> 00:14:47,750
this. If you look at this fossil fuel philanthropy report that's in this article
246
00:14:47,770 --> 00:14:51,352
that I'll put in the show notes, you'll see that a lot of, like Charles Koch is
247
00:14:51,472 --> 00:14:54,734
the guy who, or Koch, or Koch, I don't know how you pronounce it,
248
00:14:56,702 --> 00:15:00,063
But they're the organizations that are funding this
249
00:15:00,623 --> 00:15:03,744
misinformation. And you're starting to see the
250
00:15:03,784 --> 00:15:07,345
ramifications of the misinformation too, because there
251
00:15:07,405 --> 00:15:10,986
are organizations out there who are suing oil companies for
252
00:15:11,046 --> 00:15:14,207
perpetuating all this misinformation in the past, and
253
00:15:14,227 --> 00:15:17,828
for causing delays in action by governments.
254
00:15:19,172 --> 00:15:22,574
And to be honest, this is my personal feeling, until we
255
00:15:22,634 --> 00:15:25,977
get money out of election campaigns and
256
00:15:26,257 --> 00:15:29,659
having businesses, even people being able
257
00:15:29,739 --> 00:15:34,742
to donate to specific candidates for money, then
258
00:15:34,962 --> 00:15:38,236
we are not going to see a change in this. But
259
00:15:38,296 --> 00:15:42,098
until then, which will be a long time if it ever happens, until
260
00:15:42,158 --> 00:15:45,419
then, it's good to have this report. Because if you want to take
261
00:15:45,619 --> 00:15:48,940
action against climate change, you want to stop the companies who
262
00:15:48,980 --> 00:15:52,942
are fueling these misinformation campaigns by
263
00:15:53,062 --> 00:15:56,484
not buying from what they sell or what they own.
264
00:15:57,164 --> 00:16:01,085
That could be difficult, because you might have to go, like, tangle in the weeds. But
265
00:16:01,105 --> 00:16:04,287
the person, the name that I keep seeing is
266
00:16:04,387 --> 00:16:08,734
Charles Koch, or Coke, however you pronounce it, That
267
00:16:08,855 --> 00:16:27,777
person is tied to multiple corporations that probably own multiple corporations. They
268
00:16:27,837 --> 00:16:31,039
are entrenched in our world. They own chemical companies. They own oil and
269
00:16:31,079 --> 00:16:34,281
gas companies. We may not be able to get out of it right off
270
00:16:34,301 --> 00:16:37,683
the bat, but you can actually identify the people who are causing
271
00:16:37,723 --> 00:16:42,465
this misinformation, who are causing the delays in drastic
272
00:16:42,605 --> 00:16:46,408
action that needs to be taken to help not only save people's lives, but
273
00:16:46,508 --> 00:16:50,290
save our economy in the future from having to spend trillions
274
00:16:50,350 --> 00:16:53,431
of dollars into cleaning up the consequences of
275
00:16:53,572 --> 00:16:56,894
climate change. That's what it comes down to, folks. Like, we talk
276
00:16:56,934 --> 00:17:00,697
about the economy and how we need to save the economy. Think about every time
277
00:17:01,157 --> 00:17:04,860
we have to spend money on cleaning up a hurricane that's
278
00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:08,483
a Category 5 in June, floods that we don't normally
279
00:17:08,523 --> 00:17:12,006
see, unprecedented floods, hurricanes that are getting bigger and
280
00:17:12,066 --> 00:17:15,288
stronger and faster that we're seeing in
281
00:17:15,649 --> 00:17:19,011
October, late October. Right? We are starting to see all
282
00:17:19,071 --> 00:17:22,992
these storms come to a head. We're starting to see sea level rise and increased storm
283
00:17:23,132 --> 00:17:26,193
surges because the sea level is higher. We're starting to
284
00:17:26,233 --> 00:17:30,594
see that the water is getting fresher. We're starting to see that major current
285
00:17:31,335 --> 00:17:34,616
systems are actually changing or slowing down that will
286
00:17:34,656 --> 00:17:38,417
eventually shut down and cause a drastic change
287
00:17:38,497 --> 00:17:43,198
in our weather patterns around the globe. yet
288
00:17:43,318 --> 00:17:46,901
we continue to let these companies control the information
289
00:17:46,921 --> 00:17:50,823
that goes through. And think about it, with all the way information
290
00:17:50,903 --> 00:17:54,125
is spread today in terms of technology and into
291
00:17:54,185 --> 00:17:57,707
our phones and into our brains, we are the most
292
00:17:57,767 --> 00:18:00,809
susceptible to misinformation. That is probably a
293
00:18:00,889 --> 00:18:04,011
big threat to us right now because what you
294
00:18:04,072 --> 00:18:07,374
see is what you get on different social media
295
00:18:07,414 --> 00:18:10,552
platforms. And let's just be honest, No matter what side you
296
00:18:10,652 --> 00:18:13,874
are of an issue Both sides are on those platforms trying to
297
00:18:14,114 --> 00:18:18,095
put together information that will allow you to make a decision Whether
298
00:18:18,135 --> 00:18:21,357
that information is correct or not that is up for that is up to you to
299
00:18:21,417 --> 00:18:24,618
decide and up scientists to tell Right and
300
00:18:24,678 --> 00:18:28,340
for you to believe you got to know who you can believe because the
301
00:18:28,420 --> 00:18:32,621
climate Like just cluster f
302
00:18:32,781 --> 00:18:36,402
that we have seen in terms of a PR campaign
303
00:18:36,462 --> 00:18:39,686
to do something about climate change is absolutely off its
304
00:18:39,746 --> 00:18:43,210
rocker. You know, we've failed as scientists, we
305
00:18:43,310 --> 00:18:46,734
failed as communicators to ensure that
306
00:18:46,774 --> 00:18:50,058
the right information gets to the right people at the right time.
307
00:18:51,169 --> 00:18:54,491
and that's on us because like scientists we never talked about climate
308
00:18:54,511 --> 00:18:57,932
change that much or we never talked about science that much before all this technology
309
00:18:57,952 --> 00:19:01,194
came out even then we were late because we were worried that our
310
00:19:01,254 --> 00:19:05,176
information would not get to the right people or would be manipulated to
311
00:19:05,216 --> 00:19:08,518
show something else because that's happened in the past and that's because you
312
00:19:08,558 --> 00:19:11,880
know sometimes when there's big business involved we are going up
313
00:19:11,960 --> 00:19:15,103
against you know, a lot of money. And a lot of
314
00:19:15,143 --> 00:19:18,845
money can do a lot of bad things in the wrong hands. And
315
00:19:18,885 --> 00:19:22,227
that's what we've seen. And hopefully, this
316
00:19:22,287 --> 00:19:25,489
fossil fuel philanthropy report can actually get out to the right
317
00:19:25,529 --> 00:19:29,331
people and we can actually take action. It's getting out to the people. It's
318
00:19:29,451 --> 00:19:32,633
out there. We can make a difference. Just how do we
319
00:19:32,693 --> 00:19:36,441
do that is the next question. Right? That's
320
00:19:36,481 --> 00:19:40,042
really what it comes down to. How do we do that? I actually recently did,
321
00:19:40,062 --> 00:19:43,323
I was on Instagram and a
322
00:19:43,403 --> 00:19:46,804
survey came up by Meta, right? The company that owns, you
323
00:19:46,824 --> 00:19:49,985
know, Facebook and Instagram and WhatsApp and so forth. And
324
00:19:50,005 --> 00:19:53,386
it asked me a number of questions about the perception of the company, Meta itself.
325
00:19:54,026 --> 00:19:58,087
And it said, how do you feel about Meta when it comes to misinformation? And
326
00:19:58,107 --> 00:20:01,970
I was just like, it's the worst, it's the worst company for it. And
327
00:20:02,050 --> 00:20:05,293
how do you feel about Meta as a company? I don't like
328
00:20:05,333 --> 00:20:08,816
the, and I even responded, I don't like the fact that you
329
00:20:09,016 --> 00:20:12,599
manipulate other companies like the government to go after other companies
330
00:20:12,639 --> 00:20:16,062
like TikTok because you're afraid that they're putting a dent in
331
00:20:16,102 --> 00:20:19,805
your profits and your share of the attention that you
332
00:20:19,965 --> 00:20:23,554
used to get from Instagram and from Facebook. Because
333
00:20:23,594 --> 00:20:26,956
TikTok is pretty much taken over. It's almost rivaling Google at
334
00:20:26,996 --> 00:20:30,298
some point. I think it was higher at one point. And now you're seeing
335
00:20:30,338 --> 00:20:33,780
it banned at a certain time, if that ever will happen, in
336
00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:37,222
the US. Because let's be honest, Meta
337
00:20:37,242 --> 00:20:41,004
did that. They wanted to do that, they did that. And
338
00:20:41,064 --> 00:20:44,946
so they're the ones who started all this inquiry. So it's
339
00:20:45,186 --> 00:20:48,958
really... scary when this happens but
340
00:20:48,998 --> 00:20:52,100
the fact that we have access now to this information where there's people who
341
00:20:52,140 --> 00:20:55,782
are donating and companies who are donating to these non-profit organizations
342
00:20:55,802 --> 00:20:59,303
that are just there to misinform you is
343
00:20:59,403 --> 00:21:02,485
really powerful and I'm glad this came up and I'm surprised it's
344
00:21:02,505 --> 00:21:05,688
not being talked about more Because a couple of
345
00:21:05,728 --> 00:21:10,051
months ago, I did a story on how there were over
346
00:21:10,811 --> 00:21:14,174
120 senators and congresspeople who were
347
00:21:14,254 --> 00:21:18,877
being paid by fossil fuel companies or fossil fuel packs that
348
00:21:19,077 --> 00:21:22,700
would allow them to support oil and gas rather
349
00:21:22,880 --> 00:21:26,102
than the environment, rather than the country that they
350
00:21:26,142 --> 00:21:29,901
serve in the US. Right? We're starting
351
00:21:29,921 --> 00:21:33,163
to see this information come out. It's in there. It's for us. And there's
352
00:21:33,203 --> 00:21:36,605
a huge election coming to the US. This is
353
00:21:36,625 --> 00:21:40,147
the time where you say, who is involved with getting funded by the
354
00:21:40,167 --> 00:21:43,450
Koch brothers? The Koch brothers. Let's just call it the Koch brothers. The Koch brothers.
355
00:21:43,730 --> 00:21:47,532
Who is involved? Right? Then if
356
00:21:47,572 --> 00:21:51,495
they're funding certain people who are trying to get elected, maybe if
357
00:21:51,535 --> 00:21:55,674
the environment is important to you, if the economy is important to you, maybe don't vote them in. It
358
00:21:55,694 --> 00:21:58,896
doesn't matter what side they're on because they're both being funded by the same
359
00:21:58,936 --> 00:22:02,498
people. It doesn't matter what side they're on, vote somebody who's independent
360
00:22:02,518 --> 00:22:06,621
or vote somebody who's not being funded by them or funded less by them, right?
361
00:22:06,841 --> 00:22:10,563
Somebody who will represent more about you, the people
362
00:22:10,603 --> 00:22:14,565
who they are there to represent rather than the companies that are donating that
363
00:22:14,585 --> 00:22:18,728
they end up representing in place of you. So
364
00:22:18,748 --> 00:22:22,350
that's just like this article just kind of got me going because I was like, I can't believe
365
00:22:22,390 --> 00:22:25,578
this isn't being talked about a lot. It's probably because the
366
00:22:25,598 --> 00:22:28,845
Koch brothers own a lot of media outlets, right? Like, let's
367
00:22:28,885 --> 00:22:32,110
be honest here. You know, there's a reason why the
368
00:22:32,170 --> 00:22:35,373
Washington Post this year didn't, or this election term,
369
00:22:35,753 --> 00:22:39,215
didn't say they chose, they didn't choose a candidate they wanted to support. They've
370
00:22:39,236 --> 00:22:42,718
chosen a candidate all this other time, but now that, you
371
00:22:42,738 --> 00:22:45,800
know, Amazon donor Jeff Bezos owns them, he's like, you know, we're not going to choose a
372
00:22:45,820 --> 00:22:49,243
candidate because we're going to stay in the middle. You know, we're going to be journalists,
373
00:22:49,263 --> 00:22:52,525
we're going to stay in the middle. Funny how most of the articles are
374
00:22:52,565 --> 00:22:56,367
supporting like Democratic Party sort of policies and
375
00:22:56,407 --> 00:22:59,788
making and sort of criticizing Republicans. But all of a sudden, now
376
00:22:59,828 --> 00:23:03,089
you decide to stay in the middle. Maybe it's because that
377
00:23:03,189 --> 00:23:06,230
when if Kamala Harris gets in as a
378
00:23:06,310 --> 00:23:09,451
president, you're going to see a lot of taxes come to billionaires and he's
379
00:23:09,491 --> 00:23:12,792
a multibillionaire and he doesn't want to give up some of his money. That's just me going
380
00:23:12,832 --> 00:23:15,972
off on a tangent. But that's what's happening here, right? When
381
00:23:15,992 --> 00:23:19,153
these companies, these big billionaires own all these
382
00:23:19,173 --> 00:23:22,374
different companies at a powerful level, then all of a sudden they're like, hey, you know what?
383
00:23:23,272 --> 00:23:26,555
Yeah, we can do whatever we want. We decide not to take a stand. We're
384
00:23:26,575 --> 00:23:29,938
not gonna support either candidate. Well, there's a reason for
385
00:23:29,958 --> 00:23:33,718
that. There's always a reason for that. And unfortunately, that's
386
00:23:33,738 --> 00:23:36,858
just how we have to deal with it. But we have to press the press. We have to
387
00:23:36,898 --> 00:23:40,079
press the government to say, hey, you're supposed to be representing us,
388
00:23:40,139 --> 00:23:44,100
not these companies that are supporting you. And this report allows
389
00:23:44,240 --> 00:23:47,760
us to get more information on who's being supported by
390
00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:50,921
this and allowing this misinformation coming and
391
00:23:50,961 --> 00:23:54,722
allowing the government not to go further into
392
00:23:55,262 --> 00:23:58,383
supporting us and by protecting citizens. And this is
393
00:23:58,463 --> 00:24:01,724
all governments, not just the US, this is Canada, this is everything. to protect their
394
00:24:01,764 --> 00:24:06,026
citizens against environmental damage that we're causing to ourselves. So
395
00:24:06,066 --> 00:24:09,408
that's what I had to say. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Am I off the rocker
396
00:24:09,448 --> 00:24:12,790
here? Should this be more and more in the news and
397
00:24:12,830 --> 00:24:16,372
be covered more by multiple outlets? Or, you know, I find this election
398
00:24:16,412 --> 00:24:19,794
cycle, it's being ignored. Climate change in general is just being ignored.
399
00:24:19,834 --> 00:24:22,996
I don't know why. It's a big division between the two. The
400
00:24:23,096 --> 00:24:26,479
one thing I could say why is because human rights are at at stake
401
00:24:26,519 --> 00:24:43,692
here. Hopefully
402
00:24:43,732 --> 00:24:46,834
everything goes well this week, but I do recommend that you go
403
00:24:46,854 --> 00:24:50,416
out and vote I suggest strongly suggested, you know And
404
00:24:50,676 --> 00:24:54,038
for whatever party you're going for just go out and vote. It's your right It's
405
00:24:54,178 --> 00:24:57,740
something you deserve to do and everybody deserves to do that. And
406
00:24:57,860 --> 00:25:01,422
so hopefully The environment will come out ahead, but
407
00:25:01,682 --> 00:25:04,703
that's it for me today. I'd love to hear from you you can leave a
408
00:25:04,763 --> 00:25:07,945
comment on YouTube or Spotify or
409
00:25:08,165 --> 00:25:11,327
you can hit me up on Instagram at how to protect the ocean and
410
00:25:11,607 --> 00:25:14,770
That's at howtoprotecttheocean, all one word. I'd
411
00:25:14,790 --> 00:25:18,012
love to hear your thoughts on this. Thank you so much for
412
00:25:18,053 --> 00:25:21,635
listening to this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast. I'm your host, Angelo.