Deep Sea Mining: Time for a leadership change

On today's episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, the focus is on deep-sea mining and the leadership of the International Seabed Authority (ISA). The episode discusses the recent developments and different countries' stances on deep-sea...
On today's episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, the focus is on deep-sea mining and the leadership of the International Seabed Authority (ISA). The episode discusses the recent developments and different countries' stances on deep-sea mining, with some advocating for a moratorium and others taking a precautionary pause.
Please tune in to learn more about the current state of deep-sea mining and the push for a leadership change to steer it in a direction that aligns with the desires of many.
Link to articles:
1) https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jul/29/inside-the-battle-for-top-job-that-will-decide-the-future-of-deep-sea-mining
2) https://deep-sea-conservation.org/solutions/no-deep-sea-mining/
Sign Up for Updates on the process: www.speakupforblue.com/oceanapp
Connect with Speak Up For Blue:
Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf
Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc
YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube
The leadership of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) is currently under scrutiny and potential change due to concerns about trust and transparency. The current leader, Lodge, has been accused of being too closely aligned with the mining industry, lacking transparency, and advocating for the acceleration of deep-sea mining activities. This has resulted in a lack of trust among member states and a division of views within the Council.
Leticia Carvalho, sponsored by the Brazilian government, is a candidate for leadership, emphasizing the need for meaningful transformation within the ISA. She stresses the importance of trust and strong leadership within the organization, especially given the ISA's dual mandate to authorize and regulate mining for the common heritage of all mankind while safeguarding marine environments from harmful impacts.
The potential change in leadership comes at a critical juncture for deep-sea mining and the future of the world's oceans. The decision on the new leader could have significant implications for the emerging industry and the approach taken towards deep-sea mining. Carvalho's background as an oceanographer and international diplomat, coupled with her focus on a precautionary approach and transparency, contrasts with the concerns raised about Lodge's leadership.
The controversy surrounding the leadership of the ISA reflects broader concerns about the trajectory of deep-sea mining and the necessity for responsible and sustainable practices. The choice of the new leader will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of deep-sea mining and its impact on marine ecosystems. Trust and transparency are essential components in ensuring that decisions made by the ISA align with the objective of safeguarding the ocean for future generations.
The debate surrounding deep-sea mining, as discussed in the podcast episode, underscores the critical need for a precautionary approach to protect the marine environment and deep-sea ecosystems. The ISA's role in authorizing and regulating mining activities while aiming to shield the marine environment from harmful impacts is crucial. However, concerns have been raised about the current leadership of the ISA, with allegations of a lack of transparency and potential bias towards the mining industry.
The episode highlights the contrasting views within the ISA, with some countries advocating for a moratorium or precautionary pause on deep-sea mining due to uncertainties and potential risks. The discovery of dark oxygen in the deep sea further emphasizes the importance of conducting thorough research and understanding the ecosystem before engaging in mining activities.
The push by certain countries and mining companies to expedite deep-sea mining without established rules and regulations raises significant concerns. The lack of transparency in decision-making processes and potential conflicts of interest further underscore the need for a precautionary approach.
Leticia Carvalho, a Brazilian oceanographer and diplomat, has emerged as a candidate for leadership within the ISA, advocating for meaningful transformation and addressing the lack of trust and leadership within the organization. Carvalho's emphasis on the importance of thorough rule development and the necessity of completing regulations before approving any mining applications aligns with the precautionary approach needed to protect deep-sea ecosystems.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding deep-sea mining highlights the importance of adopting a precautionary approach to ensure the long-term sustainability and protection of the marine environment and deep-sea ecosystems. It is crucial to prioritize transparency, scientific research, and the development of robust regulations before proceeding with any mining activities in the deep sea.
The decision on the leadership of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) holds immense implications for the future of deep-sea mining and the health of the world's oceans. As discussed in the podcast episode, the current leader, Lodge, has faced criticism for his alleged close relationship with the mining industry, lack of transparency, and push for the acceleration of deep-sea mining. On the other hand, Leticia Carvalho, sponsored by the Brazilian government, is running for leadership, emphasizing the need for trust and meaningful transformation within the ISA.
The ISA, governed by 168 member states plus the European Union, plays a crucial role in authorizing and regulating mining for the common heritage of all mankind while protecting marine environments from harmful impacts. The decision on the leadership will determine the direction in which deep-sea mining progresses. With increasing concerns and calls for a moratorium or precautionary pause on deep-sea mining from various countries, the choice of leadership will shape the regulatory framework and approach towards deep-sea mining.
The episode highlights the urgency of understanding the deep-sea environment better before proceeding with mining activities. Recent discoveries, such as the potential role of nodules in producing oxygen in the deep sea, underscore the importance of thorough research and a precautionary approach. The lack of transparency and concerns over conflicts of interest within the ISA further emphasize the need for a leader who prioritizes ocean health and sustainable practices over expedited mining operations.
Ultimately, the decision on the leadership of the ISA will impact not only the future of deep-sea mining but also the health and sustainability of the world's oceans. It is crucial to have a leader who prioritizes transparency, scientific research, and the protection of marine ecosystems to ensure responsible and sustainable deep-sea mining practices.
00:00:00,028 --> 00:00:03,531
The big topic in the ocean today is deep sea mining.
2
00:00:04,171 --> 00:00:08,254
And at the head of it is the leadership of the International Seabed
3
00:00:08,294 --> 00:00:11,617
Authority, the ISA. And there's been somebody who's
4
00:00:11,637 --> 00:00:15,400
been in charge for quite some time who's been quite controversial
5
00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:19,043
in many circles. So is it time for a
6
00:00:19,103 --> 00:00:22,285
leadership change that will take deep sea mining into the direction where
7
00:00:22,425 --> 00:00:25,608
most people want it to go? and that is stay at
8
00:00:25,648 --> 00:00:28,891
a moratorium. We're gonna find out on today's episode of the How to Protect the Ocean
9
00:00:28,931 --> 00:00:35,616
podcast. Let's start the show. Hey everybody,
10
00:00:35,636 --> 00:00:38,759
welcome back to another exciting episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast. This
11
00:00:38,779 --> 00:00:42,002
is a podcast where you find out what's happening with the ocean, how you can speak up
12
00:00:42,042 --> 00:00:45,605
for the ocean, and what you can do to live for a better ocean by taking
13
00:00:45,865 --> 00:00:49,888
action. And on today's episode, we're gonna be talking about deep
14
00:00:49,908 --> 00:00:53,091
sea mining. This is something that, it's a topic that we've been
15
00:00:53,111 --> 00:00:56,454
talking about for quite some time here on the podcast, it's been in
16
00:00:56,494 --> 00:00:59,817
the news, and the reason why it's been in the news is there was a recent meeting,
17
00:00:59,897 --> 00:01:03,640
a summer meeting of the International Seabed Authority in Kingston,
18
00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:07,183
Jamaica, occurred in July, and there were
19
00:01:07,343 --> 00:01:10,686
some developments, some good developments that we've seen, and
20
00:01:10,786 --> 00:01:14,409
probably some not so good developments that we've seen. The big development was
21
00:01:14,449 --> 00:01:18,192
that we saw more and more people, or more and more countries,
22
00:01:18,592 --> 00:01:22,415
add their voice to saying no to deep sea mining. So currently, there's
23
00:01:22,435 --> 00:01:26,038
just different categories for that. So currently the moratorium
24
00:01:26,078 --> 00:01:29,961
and the alliance is Palau, Fiji, Samoa,
25
00:01:30,061 --> 00:01:34,524
and the federal states of Micronesia. The precautionary
26
00:01:34,684 --> 00:01:38,407
pause are countries including Chile,
27
00:01:38,847 --> 00:01:43,130
Costa Rica, Ecuador, Spain, Germany, Panama, Vanuatu,
28
00:01:43,410 --> 00:01:46,852
Dominican Republic, Sweden, Ireland, Brazil, Finland,
29
00:01:46,992 --> 00:01:51,015
Portugal, Monaco, Kingdom of Denmark, Greece,
30
00:01:51,355 --> 00:01:55,117
Malta, Honduras, Tuvalu, Guatemala,
31
00:01:55,478 --> 00:01:59,740
and Austria. And then the moratorium is
32
00:01:59,981 --> 00:02:03,971
New Zealand, Switzerland, Canada, UK. Mexico
33
00:02:04,111 --> 00:02:07,332
and Peru and then a fall all-out ban is
34
00:02:07,592 --> 00:02:10,913
France So 32 countries say no in one
35
00:02:10,973 --> 00:02:14,414
way or another to deep-sea mining now. We have seen some
36
00:02:14,474 --> 00:02:17,735
countries increase their Interest and
37
00:02:17,775 --> 00:02:21,016
increase their action towards deep-sea mining. We've
38
00:02:21,036 --> 00:02:24,437
seen Norway increase. There's Denmark I believe they started
39
00:02:24,517 --> 00:02:28,779
to explore they want to do some more quote-unquote research
40
00:02:29,499 --> 00:02:32,960
and it's it's a really interesting thing that's happening because
41
00:02:34,444 --> 00:02:38,306
This often happens, we have the International Seabed Authority, which
42
00:02:38,366 --> 00:02:42,068
is there to have essentially two functions, right?
43
00:02:42,468 --> 00:02:45,849
It's to, you know, basically it
44
00:02:45,889 --> 00:02:49,551
has two mandates. So it's to authorize and control mining,
45
00:02:50,071 --> 00:02:53,213
as well as for the common heritage of
46
00:02:53,273 --> 00:02:57,334
all mankind, and to protect the marine environment from
47
00:02:57,415 --> 00:03:01,047
harmful impacts. that's really interesting those
48
00:03:01,067 --> 00:03:04,588
are two almost a what people can argue opposing men
49
00:03:04,928 --> 00:03:08,109
mandates don't
50
00:03:08,149 --> 00:03:11,830
really fit and it reminds me of here
51
00:03:11,870 --> 00:03:15,391
in canada where i live out in bc and
52
00:03:15,451 --> 00:03:18,972
even just uh... federally the department of fisheries and
53
00:03:19,112 --> 00:03:22,452
oceans or fisheries notions canada and i think it's climate change
54
00:03:22,492 --> 00:03:25,960
a coast guard i think so i forget what the names are now But Fisheries
55
00:03:25,980 --> 00:03:29,901
and Oceans, DFO, essentially in Canada, the federal government, has
56
00:03:29,921 --> 00:03:33,382
the mandate for aquaculture to promote aquaculture, but also
57
00:03:33,462 --> 00:03:36,682
to keep the marine environment healthy. Those
58
00:03:36,722 --> 00:03:40,003
are two mandates that some could argue don't really go
59
00:03:40,063 --> 00:03:43,304
hand in hand. Others can argue that it does. But where the
60
00:03:43,364 --> 00:03:46,764
controversy came in Canada was that when it was supposed to
61
00:03:46,824 --> 00:03:50,645
be testing for diseases within aquaculture facilities,
62
00:03:51,085 --> 00:03:54,767
it presented studies that said, no, we don't think that
63
00:03:54,867 --> 00:03:58,031
these studies are saying that there's a
64
00:03:58,151 --> 00:04:02,537
significant problem with parasites and
65
00:04:02,677 --> 00:04:06,002
diseases and viruses within the aquaculture fish
66
00:04:06,022 --> 00:04:09,987
population to the point where it's affecting the wild salmon populations.
67
00:04:11,026 --> 00:04:14,328
OK, well, sure, DFO does some great work.
68
00:04:14,348 --> 00:04:17,930
There's no doubt about it. I used to work for DFO. I know firsthand some
69
00:04:17,950 --> 00:04:21,491
of the studies that they've done across the
70
00:04:21,531 --> 00:04:25,293
country have been fantastic. But how can you present
71
00:04:25,333 --> 00:04:28,775
a study that's from the government, not necessarily in all
72
00:04:28,795 --> 00:04:32,377
the time that are in primary journals, and
73
00:04:32,417 --> 00:04:35,739
you put out a technical report uh... saying you
74
00:04:35,779 --> 00:04:39,060
know something that that you know your mandate kind of goes
75
00:04:39,101 --> 00:04:42,703
against you try to protect the environment but also try to promote aquaculture and
76
00:04:42,723 --> 00:04:46,225
this is controversial just as i'm saying this i can hear the arguments
77
00:04:46,245 --> 00:04:49,347
happen was dfo their scientists they present the
78
00:04:49,387 --> 00:04:52,668
science is up to you know that the policy makers to do
79
00:04:52,688 --> 00:04:56,250
the interpretation and i get that But just in
80
00:04:56,951 --> 00:05:00,192
the eyes of the public, the eyes of conservationists, the
81
00:05:00,292 --> 00:05:03,654
eyes of people who are involved in aquaculture, they have very different
82
00:05:04,074 --> 00:05:07,556
approaches and outlooks on these two what
83
00:05:07,716 --> 00:05:11,037
seems to be opposing mandates. And it's the same thing
84
00:05:11,237 --> 00:05:14,399
with the International Seabed Authority, the ISA. When
85
00:05:14,439 --> 00:05:17,760
you have a mandate to, one, to authorize and
86
00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:21,803
control mining for the common heritage of all mankind, and
87
00:05:21,843 --> 00:05:25,046
to protect marine environment from harmful impacts. Now, you
88
00:05:25,066 --> 00:05:29,592
know, looking at that first mandate, you're looking at, hey, look, our
89
00:05:29,652 --> 00:05:33,675
planet's in the crapper. We have greenhouse gases, we have climate change. We
90
00:05:33,715 --> 00:05:37,258
need to do something to change it. A lot of significant portion of
91
00:05:37,298 --> 00:05:40,600
greenhouse gases is produced not only by the fossil fuel industry, but also by
92
00:05:40,900 --> 00:05:44,183
gas powered vehicles, right? And so when you have gas powered
93
00:05:44,203 --> 00:05:47,445
vehicles, you're always emitting some sort of greenhouse gas,
94
00:05:47,485 --> 00:05:51,188
whether it be methane, whether it be carbon dioxide, whether it be something else that
95
00:05:51,248 --> 00:05:54,630
contributes to climate change. So the more cars, the more gas powered vehicles
96
00:05:54,650 --> 00:05:57,873
we have on the road, the more
97
00:05:57,913 --> 00:06:01,115
we have climate change. As long as we keep selling gas-powered cars, we're
98
00:06:01,175 --> 00:06:05,018
not going to clean up the planet from these CO2 and
99
00:06:05,078 --> 00:06:08,921
methane gases from leaking out into the environment and
100
00:06:09,141 --> 00:06:12,824
contributing more to climate change. But if we put in electric vehicles,
101
00:06:13,184 --> 00:06:17,107
there's no emissions in the actual vehicle itself. One
102
00:06:17,127 --> 00:06:21,009
can argue that there is in the making of the battery and so forth. But
103
00:06:21,269 --> 00:06:24,651
when you look at the overall, when you compare the gas-powered vehicle to
104
00:06:24,671 --> 00:06:28,253
the electric vehicle, you're looking at overall, there's no emissions
105
00:06:28,293 --> 00:06:31,474
when you actually use the vehicle, of an electric vehicle. And
106
00:06:31,594 --> 00:06:34,856
so there's a benefit there. You're taking away the greenhouse gases that
107
00:06:34,916 --> 00:06:39,098
are contributing to climate change when you're driving
108
00:06:39,258 --> 00:06:42,580
and the actual act of driving an electric vehicle. So
109
00:06:42,640 --> 00:06:45,841
it's better. Now here's the problem, to make the batteries that are
110
00:06:45,941 --> 00:06:49,722
now the batteries, you need specific metals, cobalt,
111
00:06:49,802 --> 00:06:53,324
nickel, manganese, and so forth. You can find those
112
00:06:53,444 --> 00:06:56,685
in mines on land, but there are serious problems with
113
00:06:56,705 --> 00:07:00,166
the mines, where they are, how they're being run,
114
00:07:00,446 --> 00:07:03,667
the human rights violations that are happening there, so there's a
115
00:07:03,727 --> 00:07:06,909
lot of pressure to get the metals from elsewhere. And
116
00:07:06,929 --> 00:07:10,172
there's metals in these small little nodules I talked about
117
00:07:10,252 --> 00:07:13,716
last episode, which if you haven't seen it or you haven't listened to
118
00:07:13,776 --> 00:07:17,160
it, go back to the app after this episode, go back to the last episode. You
119
00:07:17,180 --> 00:07:20,364
can take a look about talking about dark oxygen, how these
120
00:07:20,424 --> 00:07:24,089
nodules produce potentially oxygen or help produce oxygen
121
00:07:24,209 --> 00:07:27,473
in the deep sea. here we're in a situation where it's like hey
122
00:07:27,833 --> 00:07:31,357
there are these nodules that have these metals that can be easily mined or
123
00:07:31,417 --> 00:07:34,600
not easily but mined in the deep sea we need to take it
124
00:07:34,760 --> 00:07:37,903
we know we need to take these metals and produce those metals so
125
00:07:37,923 --> 00:07:41,307
that we can make these batteries here are the couple problems with
126
00:07:41,347 --> 00:07:45,051
that one we don't know the damage we're going to do to
127
00:07:45,651 --> 00:07:48,775
deep sea right deep sea mining it's not going to be
128
00:07:48,895 --> 00:07:52,499
easy it's not going to be it's something with the deep sea we don't really understand
129
00:07:52,759 --> 00:07:56,223
and i take you back to the deep sea horizon the leak that happened there
130
00:07:56,623 --> 00:08:00,227
how detrimental it was to the gulf of mexico and to the people other
131
00:08:00,247 --> 00:08:03,711
people who use the gulf of mexico for fishing for tourism
132
00:08:03,751 --> 00:08:07,134
and so forth how bad that was and how bad it still is
133
00:08:07,154 --> 00:08:10,758
in in some terms to the poisoning of the environment
134
00:08:10,838 --> 00:08:14,101
and the water quality and the still the ramifications that we're paying the
135
00:08:14,141 --> 00:08:18,325
consequences that we're paying for it as we speak and that's been what 10 20 or
136
00:08:18,625 --> 00:08:22,169
10 to 15 years almost since it happened uh so it's
137
00:08:22,329 --> 00:08:25,772
it's a problem right we need to ensure that we are
138
00:08:26,513 --> 00:08:29,775
we understand the deep sea better before we start messing around with
139
00:08:29,895 --> 00:08:33,918
it and especially now with this dark oxygen thing
140
00:08:33,958 --> 00:08:37,200
that we've we've discovered and need more research on
141
00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:40,402
is there is actual oxygen being produced in the
142
00:08:40,442 --> 00:08:43,725
deep sea in the dark And it's really thought
143
00:08:43,765 --> 00:08:47,788
to be done by these nodules, because they increase the voltage that
144
00:08:47,828 --> 00:08:51,050
allows the separation of oxygen from
145
00:08:51,110 --> 00:08:54,553
water. So there's more oxygen in the deep sea than we originally
146
00:08:54,613 --> 00:08:58,016
thought. We thought that it would be decreasing, but it's actually increasing in some spots.
147
00:08:58,276 --> 00:09:01,458
And then the biodiversity increases in those spots. So more research needs to
148
00:09:01,498 --> 00:09:05,361
be done there. So we'd almost say, hey, this moratorium or this precautionary pause
149
00:09:05,661 --> 00:09:09,044
that some of these countries are looking for, that might be a good idea at
150
00:09:09,084 --> 00:09:12,586
this point. The ISA continues to
151
00:09:12,726 --> 00:09:15,887
push so that we start to explore and start to do more
152
00:09:15,967 --> 00:09:19,569
quote unquote research to see, hey, is this actually viable? Can
153
00:09:19,609 --> 00:09:22,710
we take out enough nodules and will it be profitable for
154
00:09:22,750 --> 00:09:26,231
those companies to actually do it? Now, with that said,
155
00:09:26,271 --> 00:09:29,452
with this push for these for these mandates, for
156
00:09:29,472 --> 00:09:33,374
these two mandates, one authorized and control mining for
157
00:09:33,434 --> 00:09:36,655
the common good, a common heritage of all mankind. and to
158
00:09:36,715 --> 00:09:40,336
protect the marine environment from harmful impacts, is really run
159
00:09:40,516 --> 00:09:43,777
by this ISA, but really run by the leader of this
160
00:09:43,937 --> 00:09:47,438
ISA. And for the longest time, the
161
00:09:47,518 --> 00:09:50,959
leader has been a British lawyer. I'm looking
162
00:09:50,979 --> 00:09:54,120
at the article for his name. It's Lodge. I'm
163
00:09:54,140 --> 00:10:00,162
trying to see what his full name is. and
164
00:10:17,794 --> 00:10:21,338
And so there's a battle for this leadership. And the reason why
165
00:10:21,358 --> 00:10:24,460
is that a lot of people have said that trust is
166
00:10:24,560 --> 00:10:28,584
broken and leadership is missing. And this is Leticia Carvalho,
167
00:10:28,644 --> 00:10:32,047
who is sponsored by the Brazilian government. And
168
00:10:32,508 --> 00:10:35,811
she's here to say, hey, I'm running for the leadership for this because the trust is
169
00:10:35,891 --> 00:10:39,294
broken and leadership is missing. uh... later than
170
00:10:39,575 --> 00:10:42,739
this is the you know what the i say they're gonna be voting for this uh...
171
00:10:42,759 --> 00:10:46,485
for this leader uh... who's gonna be it's gonna be facing critical
172
00:10:46,645 --> 00:10:50,070
votes that could impact the nascent industry for years
173
00:10:50,110 --> 00:10:53,675
to come so who will be the next leader So,
174
00:10:53,955 --> 00:10:57,298
you know, right now the battle for leadership might be, you
175
00:10:57,318 --> 00:11:00,520
know, might sound like it to the average person, like, you know,
176
00:11:00,540 --> 00:11:03,662
a remote technical concern, but the election of the
177
00:11:03,702 --> 00:11:07,265
authority secretary, according to this article in the Guardian, General, comes
178
00:11:07,905 --> 00:11:11,488
at a pivotal moment
179
00:11:12,208 --> 00:11:17,284
for the deep sea mining and therefore the future of the world's oceans. The
180
00:11:17,324 --> 00:11:20,827
cause for pause on exploitation of the seabed
181
00:11:21,187 --> 00:11:36,379
are intensifying. What
182
00:11:36,419 --> 00:11:40,020
happens in the movies when you don't listen to scientists? Bad
183
00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:43,500
stuff happens. And we're already seeing it in real life with climate
184
00:11:43,520 --> 00:11:47,141
change. When scientists were talking about 30, 40 years ago, 50 years
185
00:11:47,181 --> 00:11:50,561
ago, now we're not listening. And look
186
00:11:50,761 --> 00:11:54,382
at the situation we're in now. We're now considering deep sea mining to help with
187
00:11:54,442 --> 00:11:57,863
climate change, which could further destroy the planet or hurt the planet.
188
00:11:58,323 --> 00:12:01,723
Now, the ISA, just to give a little background, is governed by 168 member states plus the
189
00:12:01,803 --> 00:12:06,124
European Union. So
190
00:12:06,185 --> 00:12:09,728
it has those two mandates, and so during Lodge's
191
00:12:09,848 --> 00:12:13,112
eight year tenure, he has been accused of
192
00:12:13,272 --> 00:12:16,795
closeness to the mining industry, overstepping his neutral
193
00:12:16,855 --> 00:12:20,439
role, and of presiding over an authority that
194
00:12:20,579 --> 00:12:24,063
lacks transparency. And so a New York Times piece
195
00:12:24,103 --> 00:12:27,786
published earlier this month also accused him of pushing countries to accelerate
196
00:12:27,827 --> 00:12:31,310
the start of deep sea mining. Of course, he denies those claims.
197
00:12:31,350 --> 00:12:34,874
Now, Cavallo, a Brazilian oceanographer and
198
00:12:34,974 --> 00:12:38,297
international diplomat, says it is time For
199
00:12:38,398 --> 00:12:42,022
meaningful transformation at the Seabed Authority, the current deep divide
200
00:12:42,223 --> 00:12:45,687
of views among the state parties in the Council
201
00:12:45,707 --> 00:12:49,232
is heavily due to the lack of trust and leadership on top of whatever
202
00:12:49,352 --> 00:12:53,338
scientific gaps we may have or asymmetry of
203
00:12:53,438 --> 00:13:14,135
knowledge between the members. the problem. not
204
00:13:14,175 --> 00:13:17,416
mad at, to say, hey, look, there are some serious concerns that some
205
00:13:17,736 --> 00:13:21,817
very smart people and accomplished people are considering. And
206
00:13:22,097 --> 00:13:25,338
there's also the mining companies who are like, hey, we need to get on this right
207
00:13:25,378 --> 00:13:28,959
now. We've invested a ton of money into exploring the
208
00:13:28,999 --> 00:13:32,220
deep sea to get deep sea mining. We wanna make sure
209
00:13:32,280 --> 00:13:35,901
that we can mine at some point soon because time
210
00:13:35,961 --> 00:13:39,382
is money at this point. And they wanna get into production as soon
211
00:13:39,923 --> 00:13:43,686
as possible. So, so far, you
212
00:13:43,726 --> 00:13:47,927
know, in terms of contracts, the authority has issued 31 exploration
213
00:13:47,967 --> 00:13:51,368
contracts sponsored by 14 nations in an area covering
214
00:13:51,388 --> 00:13:54,889
about 1.5 square kilometers of the world's seabed,
215
00:13:55,349 --> 00:13:58,690
mostly in the equatorial Pacific between Hawaii and
216
00:13:58,810 --> 00:14:01,991
Mexico. And these also, these areas, just
217
00:14:02,011 --> 00:14:05,432
to let you know, have been explored in some cases in
218
00:14:05,472 --> 00:14:09,033
certain areas, and they're very, very, very
219
00:14:09,113 --> 00:14:13,694
diverse when you're looking at the actual seabed.
220
00:14:13,754 --> 00:14:17,155
They're very diverse in animals. These contracts with
221
00:14:17,215 --> 00:14:20,676
countries including China, Russia, South Korea, India,
222
00:14:21,076 --> 00:14:24,257
Britain, France, Poland, Brazil, Japan, Jamaica, and
223
00:14:24,357 --> 00:14:27,777
Belgium allow exploration of the seabed but not commercial mining,
224
00:14:27,817 --> 00:14:31,859
so just exploration. No exploitation contracts
225
00:14:31,999 --> 00:14:35,760
which would permit mining to go ahead have been issued yet, but
226
00:14:35,880 --> 00:14:39,041
efforts by industry in some states have accelerated the
227
00:14:39,101 --> 00:14:42,743
race to mine. So there are some people who are trying to get ahead and
228
00:14:42,803 --> 00:14:45,884
seeing what they can do. One firm called the
229
00:14:45,964 --> 00:14:50,567
Metals Company, TMC, based in Canada, I'm not
230
00:14:50,627 --> 00:14:54,171
happy about that. And partnered with the Pacific states of Nauru and
231
00:14:54,251 --> 00:14:57,695
Tonga and Kiribati has said it will apply for
232
00:14:57,815 --> 00:15:01,479
permission to mine later this year before
233
00:15:01,579 --> 00:15:04,783
rules and regulations are likely to be in place. Now, here's the problem right
234
00:15:04,843 --> 00:15:08,527
there in that sentence. Before rules and regulations are in place, they
235
00:15:08,547 --> 00:15:12,058
want to mine for commercial purposes. right before
236
00:15:12,098 --> 00:15:15,419
the rules and regulations are in place. This is the problem when we start to move
237
00:15:15,479 --> 00:15:19,320
forward on something that's developed. It takes time to understand the
238
00:15:19,380 --> 00:15:23,020
environment that you're going to exploit. Essentially,
239
00:15:23,040 --> 00:15:26,101
you're going to be digging up on the surface or
240
00:15:26,641 --> 00:15:30,422
the seabed, and you're going to be moving things around. We
241
00:15:30,462 --> 00:15:33,863
need to know what the effects are going to be in that. And I
242
00:15:33,883 --> 00:15:37,183
just don't know if we're going to be able to find out enough information before this goes. And now
243
00:15:37,223 --> 00:15:41,438
they want to move before the rules and regulations are in place? That
244
00:15:41,499 --> 00:15:44,764
seems a little bit presumptive there. I just don't like
245
00:15:44,824 --> 00:15:47,993
the fact that this is something that, you know... we need
246
00:15:48,013 --> 00:15:51,095
to go. So Cavallo, who's running for this leadership, claims it is
247
00:15:51,175 --> 00:15:54,477
Lodge's alleged close relationship with the company that
248
00:15:54,517 --> 00:15:57,959
is the problem. Trust she claims
249
00:15:58,019 --> 00:16:01,440
began to ebb away in 2018 after
250
00:16:01,460 --> 00:16:04,702
the Secretary General appeared in a video wearing a hard hat with
251
00:16:04,762 --> 00:16:07,844
the Deep Green logo on it. Deep Green is the
252
00:16:07,924 --> 00:16:11,306
former name of the metals company. What is intriguing is
253
00:16:11,346 --> 00:16:14,788
the leadership of multilateral of
254
00:16:14,888 --> 00:16:19,011
a multilateral organization embracing one company's demands, pushing
255
00:16:19,071 --> 00:16:22,993
it into the ISA's council's process to develop mining
256
00:16:23,133 --> 00:16:27,196
code," she says. So that's the problem, right? So you're having this leader
257
00:16:27,296 --> 00:16:31,059
who's like, seems to be pushing what's being said by this company saying,
258
00:16:31,079 --> 00:16:34,661
hey, look, this is what we need to do, but we don't even have rules and regulations
259
00:16:34,681 --> 00:16:37,964
yet. We don't even understand what the problem is. We haven't even explored the
260
00:16:38,004 --> 00:16:41,386
deep sea to the point where we know what's gonna happen. I mean, we just
261
00:16:41,446 --> 00:16:44,821
found out about dark oxygen. We just found out about it. I
262
00:16:44,861 --> 00:16:48,584
can't tell you enough how big this discovery
263
00:16:48,864 --> 00:16:51,966
is, how big it is to the deep sea and our
264
00:16:52,006 --> 00:16:55,088
understanding of the animals that are into the deep sea. At this point, we
265
00:16:55,128 --> 00:16:59,051
were looking at hydrothermal vents and how animals are surviving in
266
00:16:59,571 --> 00:17:03,213
really high temperatures and under sulfur conditions, sulfuric acid
267
00:17:03,233 --> 00:17:06,416
conditions. It's crazy to see that happening. Now we
268
00:17:06,436 --> 00:17:10,338
know we have areas where there's pockets of increased oxygen. It's
269
00:17:10,378 --> 00:17:13,500
insane. So she goes on to say, Cavalli goes on to say, there
270
00:17:13,540 --> 00:17:16,762
is a problem with being seen to be too close to a company that is
271
00:17:16,822 --> 00:17:20,825
driven by results for its investors. Again,
272
00:17:20,905 --> 00:17:24,227
see that conflict of interest. ISA is a regulatory body with
273
00:17:24,287 --> 00:17:27,770
a dual mandate, determining the rules and procedures for deep sea mining while
274
00:17:27,830 --> 00:17:30,992
protecting the deep sea ecosystems. That means you would think that
275
00:17:31,012 --> 00:17:34,174
there is a precautionary approach that needs to be taken, right? A
276
00:17:34,254 --> 00:17:38,176
precautionary approach. But that doesn't seem to be happening. It
277
00:17:38,216 --> 00:17:41,638
seems like we are continuing to move forward without
278
00:17:41,718 --> 00:17:45,021
saying, hey, look, this is not really good.
279
00:17:45,161 --> 00:17:48,363
We need to make sure that we're not just
280
00:17:48,403 --> 00:17:51,464
doing it for investors. We're doing this to protect the ocean. This is going to
281
00:17:51,484 --> 00:17:55,107
have much more consequences to the
282
00:17:55,187 --> 00:17:58,388
world than it is for these investors. So I think it's really
283
00:17:58,408 --> 00:18:01,830
important now Cavallo has worked in the as a regulator in
284
00:18:01,870 --> 00:18:05,071
the Brazil's oil industry Which is really interesting and she
285
00:18:05,111 --> 00:18:08,713
believes the rules governing deep-sea mining will take time and that
286
00:18:08,813 --> 00:18:12,495
no mining application should be approved before
287
00:18:12,895 --> 00:18:16,608
they are Complicated before they're completed now look I'm
288
00:18:16,648 --> 00:18:19,989
biased already, but I like Cavallo. I like the fact
289
00:18:20,049 --> 00:18:23,230
that she's taking a precautionary approach. I hope she gets
290
00:18:23,310 --> 00:18:26,772
put into power because this is gonna be something that
291
00:18:27,232 --> 00:18:31,573
will be needed, right? And we know Kiribati
292
00:18:31,913 --> 00:18:36,555
is backing Lodge in getting the leadership again.
293
00:18:36,935 --> 00:18:40,416
And we know Kiribati is one of the countries that wants to start mining.
294
00:18:40,436 --> 00:18:43,735
So right then and there, there's a problem. Right.
295
00:18:43,755 --> 00:18:46,816
So you're backed by this country, but they want to
296
00:18:46,836 --> 00:18:50,016
start commercial mining. You have been accused of being too
297
00:18:50,076 --> 00:18:54,257
close to mining companies wearing their hard hats in videos saying,
298
00:18:54,277 --> 00:18:57,858
hey, we need to start deep sea mining. But you're also moving
299
00:18:58,118 --> 00:19:01,919
forward with some of the things are trying to push and accelerate deep
300
00:19:01,959 --> 00:19:05,400
sea mining aspiration and commercial deep sea mining. I'm
301
00:19:05,420 --> 00:19:08,622
sure what goes along with that. without even
302
00:19:08,662 --> 00:19:12,345
having rules and regulations in place. This makes no sense whatsoever.
303
00:19:13,486 --> 00:19:16,788
And just judging based on what's happened in the past in terms
304
00:19:16,828 --> 00:19:20,550
of how the meetings have gone in Kingston, how hotels
305
00:19:20,590 --> 00:19:24,813
have been switched and how, you know, observing nonprofit organizations
306
00:19:24,873 --> 00:19:27,995
and experts have been put in different rooms so that delegates have to
307
00:19:28,095 --> 00:19:31,137
move rooms or call the people who they need to
308
00:19:32,818 --> 00:19:35,941
you know, who they need to confide in
309
00:19:35,981 --> 00:19:39,203
to be like, hey, what's going on here? This is what this country is saying that
310
00:19:39,223 --> 00:19:42,786
we need to do. They want to go ahead with deep sea mining. What's the problem? Where
311
00:19:42,986 --> 00:19:46,249
are the risks? All this kind of stuff. They were in a different room
312
00:19:46,449 --> 00:19:49,852
and they weren't even allowed to go into the room where the negotiations were happening.
313
00:19:51,622 --> 00:19:55,264
It doesn't provide a lot of transparency. It doesn't allow for critique.
314
00:19:56,004 --> 00:19:59,546
It doesn't allow for transparency. It's sketchy. It's
315
00:19:59,606 --> 00:20:02,748
sketchy at best. And that's not good. You want this
316
00:20:02,848 --> 00:20:06,009
process, you know, if there is going to be deep sea mining, which
317
00:20:06,049 --> 00:20:09,812
I don't believe there should be, but if there is going to be deep sea mining, you
318
00:20:09,852 --> 00:20:12,973
want to make sure that the process is transparent. You want to make sure that the rules and
319
00:20:12,993 --> 00:20:16,395
regulations are not only going to be put in place, you know, that
320
00:20:16,415 --> 00:20:21,306
are going to be more in the cautionary approach, but you want to make sure that they're enforced. And
321
00:20:21,386 --> 00:20:24,474
that's a lot of work to put in place. It's a lot of
322
00:20:24,514 --> 00:20:27,633
work to put in place. So, I think it'll be interesting to
323
00:20:27,733 --> 00:20:31,016
see, you know, where everything is
324
00:20:31,036 --> 00:20:34,519
going to go. Lodge did not interview for this
325
00:20:35,320 --> 00:20:38,623
article, so we didn't really get, you know, his side
326
00:20:38,703 --> 00:20:42,247
on this, but it seems like Carvalho is somebody who
327
00:20:42,447 --> 00:20:46,131
is willing to be transparent, somebody who is willing to
328
00:20:46,591 --> 00:20:49,894
keep the ocean's health in mind, but
329
00:20:50,034 --> 00:20:53,259
still you know, be able to put those rules and regulations in place to
330
00:20:53,279 --> 00:20:56,425
mine. I mean, I think it's inevitable that deep sea mining is going to
331
00:20:56,465 --> 00:21:00,937
happen, but how it's going to happen is a very important. It's
332
00:21:01,057 --> 00:21:04,220
a very important process. We need to make sure we're doing it
333
00:21:04,260 --> 00:21:07,482
properly. And we need to make sure that we're doing everything we can to
334
00:21:07,503 --> 00:21:10,805
protect the deep sea, because we know nothing about the deep sea. We know very, very
335
00:21:10,885 --> 00:21:14,288
little about the deep sea. And so discoveries like we
336
00:21:14,308 --> 00:21:17,550
talked about in the last episode with the dark oxygen, that's going
337
00:21:17,570 --> 00:21:20,793
to be something that needs to be explored more. And we need to make sure
338
00:21:20,813 --> 00:21:24,856
that we know more about it before we make any crazy claims
339
00:21:24,876 --> 00:21:28,018
that we need to do some deep sea mining. So that's it for me
340
00:21:28,079 --> 00:21:31,240
today. I would love to hear your point of view. Who do
341
00:21:31,280 --> 00:21:34,602
you think should get into power? Do you think it should
342
00:21:34,662 --> 00:21:38,024
be Carvalho or do you think it should be Lodge? I would love to know what
343
00:21:38,044 --> 00:21:41,106
you think. If you're on Spotify, listening to this on Spotify, I'll put a
344
00:21:41,146 --> 00:21:44,527
poll and you tell me which ones you think, you tell me which person
345
00:21:44,547 --> 00:21:47,929
you think should be going in. And yeah, that's
346
00:21:48,269 --> 00:21:52,251
it. If you want to leave a comment on the YouTube video,
347
00:21:52,271 --> 00:21:55,532
you can do that because I'm doing video podcasting now on Spotify and on
348
00:21:55,572 --> 00:21:58,793
YouTube, but also still doing the audio thing. So look
349
00:21:58,833 --> 00:22:02,175
me up on Apple, look me up on Spotify, look me
350
00:22:02,295 --> 00:22:05,416
up on Overcast or whatever app you love to
351
00:22:05,456 --> 00:22:08,617
listen to on your podcast. I will be there. And if I'm not, let me
352
00:22:08,677 --> 00:22:12,320
know and I will try and get on it. I'm trying to be on every podcast
353
00:22:12,380 --> 00:22:15,503
app that I know that is available. But also, if you want to get
354
00:22:15,523 --> 00:22:19,847
a hold of me, you can do so by DMing me at HowToProtectTheOcean
355
00:22:20,507 --> 00:22:23,790
on Instagram. That's at HowToProtectTheOcean. And
356
00:22:23,811 --> 00:22:26,853
I want to thank you so much for joining me on today's episode of the How to
357
00:22:26,873 --> 00:22:30,597
Protect the Ocean podcast. Have a great day. We'll talk to you next time. And happy conservation.