Aug. 9, 2024
Young Environmentalists Rally Behind Kamala Harris for President
Andrew Lewin discusses the contrasting approaches of the political parties towards climate change. Exploring the potential impact of the Inflation Reduction Act by President Biden and the environmental initiatives of P.P. Harris, the episode delves...
Andrew Lewin discusses the contrasting approaches of the political parties towards climate change. Exploring the potential impact of the Inflation Reduction Act by President Biden and the environmental initiatives of P.P. Harris, the episode delves into the policy perspectives shaping environmental action. From rumors about Republicans' strategies to combat climate change to the implications for the environment, this episode provides insights into current political dynamics influencing ocean conservation efforts.
Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program.
Do you want to join my Ocean Community?
Sign Up for Updates on the process: www.speakupforblue.com/oceanapp
Sign Up for Updates on the process: www.speakupforblue.com/oceanapp
Sign up for our Newsletter: http://www.speakupforblue.com/newsletter
Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI
Connect with Speak Up For Blue:
Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf
Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc
YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube
Kamala Harris is gaining popularity among environmentalists as a more appealing candidate for the environment due to her track record of prosecuting oil companies and her co-sponsorship of the Green New Deal. Harris has a history of holding big oil companies accountable for their actions, securing settlements with Chevron, BP, and ConocoPhillips over their mishandling of hazardous materials. This proactive approach to environmental justice has resonated with many young voters and environmental organizations.
Harris's stance on environmental issues, coupled with her willingness to take on polluters, has positioned her as a candidate unafraid to tackle environmental and climate policy at its root, especially in holding polluters accountable. This contrasts with a more moderate policy approach seen in other candidates, including President Biden. Harris's commitment to environmental justice and her past actions as a prosecutor have garnered support from organizations like the Sunrise Movement and the Green New Deal Network.
Despite some shifts in her stance, such as no longer supporting a ban on fracking, Harris's overall environmental platform is viewed as more progressive than that of other candidates. Her emphasis on environmental policy and her history of standing up to big oil companies have energized the environmental community and provided hope for stronger environmental protections in the future.
Young voters and environmental activists are increasingly seeking more aggressive action on climate change, recognizing the severity of the climate crisis. In a podcast episode, it was highlighted that many young environmentalists and organizations view Kamala Harris as a candidate willing to take bold steps in tackling environmental and climate policy. Harris has a track record of going after big oil companies as a prosecutor and co-sponsoring the Green New Deal as a senator, demonstrating her commitment to holding polluters accountable.
The Sunrise Movement, a youth-led organization advocating for government intervention on climate change, endorsed Harris due to her history of holding big oil accountable for their actions. This endorsement signifies the support of young voters for Harris's approach to environmental issues. Additionally, Harris's early career work as a district attorney in San Francisco, where she created an environmental justice unit, further showcases her dedication to addressing environmental concerns.
Furthermore, Harris's settlements with major oil companies like Chevron, BP, and ConocoPhillips over their mishandling of hazardous materials demonstrate her willingness to take legal action against polluters. This proactive stance resonates with young voters and environmental activists who are looking for leaders unafraid to challenge powerful industries and prioritize environmental protection.
Overall, the episode emphasizes that Harris is perceived as a candidate who is not only willing but also capable of taking decisive action on climate change and environmental policy. Her track record of holding polluters accountable and advocating for environmental justice aligns with the desires of young voters and activists for more aggressive measures to combat the climate crisis.
One key takeaway from the podcast episode is the shift towards a focus on policy, especially environmental policy, in the upcoming election. The discussion highlights how Kamala Harris is being seen as a more progressive candidate on environmental issues compared to Biden. Harris's track record of holding big oil companies accountable and her co-sponsorship of the Green New Deal have garnered support from young environmentalists and organizations advocating for climate action.
The episode emphasizes that while Biden has made some environmental wins, there is a growing sentiment among environmental activists that more needs to be done to address the severity of the climate crisis. Harris's proactive approach in prosecuting oil companies and her commitment to environmental justice have resonated with many who are looking for stronger action on climate change.
The comparison between Harris and Biden in terms of environmental policy underscores a shift towards prioritizing candidates based on their stance on critical issues like climate change. Harris's willingness to confront polluters and push for stricter regulations sets her apart as a candidate unafraid to take on powerful interests in the fossil fuel industry.
As the election approaches, the podcast suggests that the choice between candidates is increasingly framed by their environmental policies. Harris's evolution on issues like fracking and her commitment to progressive environmental platforms signal a potential shift towards more robust environmental protection measures if she were to be elected.
Overall, the episode highlights the growing importance of environmental policy in the election discourse and positions Harris as a candidate who represents a more progressive stance on environmental issues compared to Biden. This shift towards prioritizing candidates based on their environmental commitments reflects a broader trend towards policy-focused decision-making in the upcoming election.
Transcript
1
00:00:00,188 --> 00:00:03,470
If you think President Biden was good for climate change and
2
00:00:03,490 --> 00:00:06,912
the environment by passing the Inflation Reduction Act, well,
3
00:00:06,993 --> 00:00:10,455
a lot of environmentalists in the U.S. think that P.P.
4
00:00:10,495 --> 00:00:13,837
Harris will actually be better. And
5
00:00:13,857 --> 00:00:17,800
we're going to talk about why on this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast. Let's
6
00:00:17,820 --> 00:00:23,143
start the show. Hey
7
00:00:23,183 --> 00:00:26,587
everybody, welcome back to another exciting episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast. I'm
8
00:00:26,607 --> 00:00:29,790
your host Andrew Lewin, and this is the podcast where you find out what's happening with
9
00:00:29,830 --> 00:00:33,194
the ocean, how you can speak up for the ocean, and what you can do to live for
10
00:00:33,214 --> 00:00:36,537
a better ocean by taking action. And on today's episode, we're
11
00:00:36,557 --> 00:00:39,801
going to be talking about action taking from a policy perspective. And
12
00:00:40,121 --> 00:00:43,883
look, it's all on your news feeds, it's on your TV,
13
00:00:43,963 --> 00:00:48,265
you can't get away from it, it's on the radio, it's on podcasts. We're
14
00:00:48,285 --> 00:00:51,546
gonna talk about the presidential debate. I know last
15
00:00:51,586 --> 00:00:55,387
time I talked about politics, I said, we're not gonna talk about the presidential debate.
16
00:00:55,727 --> 00:00:59,528
But there is a significant difference in the parties
17
00:00:59,748 --> 00:01:03,350
and their approach towards doing something about climate
18
00:01:03,390 --> 00:01:06,751
change. And if you wanna know how both parties
19
00:01:06,811 --> 00:01:10,872
are doing, on one side you have the Republicans, who
20
00:01:11,092 --> 00:01:16,195
are rumored and even, I guess, the VP candidate
21
00:01:16,275 --> 00:01:19,437
for the Republicans, Vance, J.D. Vance, has
22
00:01:19,477 --> 00:01:22,959
come out, or not has come out, but actually wrote
23
00:01:22,979 --> 00:01:26,481
the forward, I believe, for Project 2025, a
24
00:01:26,581 --> 00:01:30,203
notorious bill or a notorious plan of action that
25
00:01:31,524 --> 00:01:35,346
some Republicans think that Donald Trump should take when
26
00:01:35,366 --> 00:01:39,088
and if he gets into the presidency. And
27
00:01:39,849 --> 00:01:43,171
if you want to know how that's going to affect the environment, I'm going to link to
28
00:01:43,211 --> 00:01:46,292
an article on LinkedIn by a good friend of mine, doctor, or
29
00:01:46,333 --> 00:01:50,535
doctor, should be a doctor, Angelo Villa Gomez. He
30
00:01:50,595 --> 00:01:54,577
put out just all the resources you need to know how the
31
00:01:54,677 --> 00:01:58,199
Project 2025 is going to affect climate change,
32
00:01:58,239 --> 00:02:01,601
fossil fuels, Environmental Protection Agency, NOAA, Ocean
33
00:02:01,621 --> 00:02:06,304
Conservation, NOAA Weather Service, Department of Interior, Antiquities
34
00:02:06,444 --> 00:02:09,966
Act, public lands, wildlife and migratory birds.
35
00:02:29,380 --> 00:02:32,602
and also reduce inflation. And it's an act that is
36
00:02:33,122 --> 00:02:36,344
probably the most progressive act. It has been touted as the most
37
00:02:36,385 --> 00:02:40,147
pervasive act to
38
00:02:40,227 --> 00:02:44,169
fight climate change than we've ever seen before. However, a
39
00:02:44,229 --> 00:02:47,732
lot of environmentalists and a lot of environmental organizations in
40
00:02:47,752 --> 00:02:51,414
the US and outside the US have criticized the Biden administration for
41
00:02:51,494 --> 00:02:55,476
not doing enough. and so especially young
42
00:02:55,516 --> 00:02:58,737
environmentalists, and they want to see more action. And
43
00:02:58,777 --> 00:03:02,138
they also pointed out that Harris's record, Kamala Harris's
44
00:03:02,218 --> 00:03:06,260
record for prosecuting oil companies and her co-sponsorship of
45
00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:09,501
the Green New Deal are reasons for her to be, that
46
00:03:09,561 --> 00:03:12,962
she will be a better president for the environment than
47
00:03:13,162 --> 00:03:16,683
President Biden. So there's a lot of excitement in the air. Look, it's
48
00:03:16,723 --> 00:03:20,104
been about a week since, a little over a week that
49
00:03:20,144 --> 00:03:23,406
you're hearing, since you're hearing this, that uh... washington like this
50
00:03:23,446 --> 00:03:26,928
is two weeks that uh... kamala harris vp kamala harris has
51
00:03:26,968 --> 00:03:30,251
been named as the presidential candidate for uh...
52
00:03:30,811 --> 00:03:34,333
the democrats uh... and uh... she has injected a
53
00:03:34,373 --> 00:03:37,735
lot of excitement she got actually quickly became uh...
54
00:03:38,616 --> 00:03:41,898
the nominee with the amount of money that she raised from
55
00:03:41,918 --> 00:03:45,821
a lot of different groups people are happy people are in our energize
56
00:03:45,861 --> 00:03:49,263
their is this sort of new
57
00:03:49,363 --> 00:03:53,187
sort of look on the presidential campaign. You could see it before
58
00:03:53,307 --> 00:03:56,910
when Biden was still running and it ran against Donald
59
00:03:56,930 --> 00:04:00,174
Trump that you know he was people were not excited
60
00:04:00,194 --> 00:04:03,457
people like are you serious this is these are the only two out
61
00:04:03,497 --> 00:04:06,620
of the population of over 350 million these are the only two people that we
62
00:04:06,660 --> 00:04:09,941
get to choose from. People were a little distraught. They were distraught not
63
00:04:10,002 --> 00:04:13,402
only at Donald Trump and his antics, but they're distraught by you know,
64
00:04:13,542 --> 00:04:16,783
President Biden in his antics, you know, he's looks old.
65
00:04:17,023 --> 00:04:20,584
He looks older. He looks like he's having trouble, you
66
00:04:20,604 --> 00:04:24,025
know, putting words together during speeches. His the last debate
67
00:04:24,065 --> 00:04:27,446
he did with Donald Trump was not very good. And so people were
68
00:04:27,486 --> 00:04:31,246
concerned and a lot of people in the Democrats were very concerned. And
69
00:04:31,306 --> 00:04:34,707
so that's when, you know, we started to see this shift
70
00:04:34,747 --> 00:04:38,728
and started to see, hey, you know, Kamala Harris is going to be the
71
00:04:38,788 --> 00:04:42,110
next presidential nominee. And nobody believed it. It was a long shot
72
00:04:42,150 --> 00:04:45,472
because President Biden had to be the one that was going
73
00:04:45,532 --> 00:04:48,653
to say no when he finally did it. Whether he wanted to do it or
74
00:04:48,713 --> 00:04:51,915
not, he did it. And there's just been this new energy that
75
00:04:52,215 --> 00:04:55,457
in the election itself. The Republicans are trying to
76
00:04:55,537 --> 00:04:58,978
figure out what to do. They were attacking Biden for his
77
00:04:59,258 --> 00:05:02,659
age and the fact that he was messing up words and messing up people's
78
00:05:02,739 --> 00:05:06,260
names as he was introducing them, calling President
79
00:05:06,980 --> 00:05:10,782
Zelensky, who's Ukrainian, President Putin, who's
80
00:05:10,862 --> 00:05:14,883
Russian and trying to invade, is invading his country. Obviously,
81
00:05:15,043 --> 00:05:18,424
not a good sign. And so now with
82
00:05:18,564 --> 00:05:22,106
Kamala Harris in as the nominee and
83
00:05:22,206 --> 00:05:25,500
as the candidate, you know, holy cow, like this is,
84
00:05:25,640 --> 00:05:28,923
this has changed. And, you know, just as I'm recording this
85
00:05:28,983 --> 00:05:32,746
episode, it's been about a day since they, I
86
00:05:32,806 --> 00:05:36,589
believe it's Watts is his name, the VP candidate
87
00:05:36,689 --> 00:05:40,011
for the Harris ticket. He's going to be on the ticket. He's
88
00:05:40,031 --> 00:05:43,254
going to be, if she gets elected president, he will
89
00:05:43,294 --> 00:05:46,668
be the next vice president. And, but What's
90
00:05:46,728 --> 00:05:49,810
going back, and let's get away from that, and let's go into sort of
91
00:05:49,890 --> 00:05:53,153
her record against oil and
92
00:05:53,173 --> 00:05:56,575
gas companies, and why people
93
00:05:56,635 --> 00:06:00,218
are really following her. So representatives from 11 organizations devoted to elevating
94
00:06:00,278 --> 00:06:03,760
young voters' concerns about climate change said Harris's record
95
00:06:03,780 --> 00:06:07,322
of going after big oil companies as a prosecutor and
96
00:06:07,383 --> 00:06:11,425
her co-sponsorship of the Green New Deal as a senator make
97
00:06:11,505 --> 00:06:14,727
her a more appealing candidate than Biden despite his
98
00:06:14,787 --> 00:06:18,268
environmental wins. So it's not saying that Biden was bad, just Biden over
99
00:06:18,308 --> 00:06:21,570
the last little bit has approved oil
100
00:06:21,590 --> 00:06:24,971
and gas projects that were not expected to be approved and had
101
00:06:25,011 --> 00:06:28,473
a lot of controversy surrounding it. But when it comes to Harris,
102
00:06:28,573 --> 00:06:31,776
she has a history around holding big oil accountable in
103
00:06:31,816 --> 00:06:34,939
a way that we haven't seen and haven't been able to do for the
104
00:06:34,979 --> 00:06:39,083
last four years. This is said by Aru Shiniaeji, a
105
00:06:39,103 --> 00:06:42,626
26-year-old that's the executive director of the Sunrise Movement, which pushes
106
00:06:43,247 --> 00:06:46,770
for government interventions to address climate change. And
107
00:06:46,790 --> 00:06:50,372
the Green New Deal Network, a coalition of 19 progressive environmental and
108
00:06:50,432 --> 00:06:54,133
social justice organizations, including the Sunrise Movement, endorsed Harris
109
00:06:54,173 --> 00:06:57,694
this week, but had not previously issued an endorsement for
110
00:06:57,794 --> 00:07:01,316
Biden. So having these young
111
00:07:01,536 --> 00:07:05,598
environmentalists as part of the endorsement really
112
00:07:05,658 --> 00:07:08,920
helps the environmental movement. They represent a lot of people. And at one
113
00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:12,802
point, they were telling members, when Biden was president, they were telling members, we're
114
00:07:12,842 --> 00:07:16,184
just telling them not to vote, which is something you don't want to do, because that
115
00:07:16,264 --> 00:07:20,987
happened in 2016 when Donald
116
00:07:21,007 --> 00:07:24,129
Trump became president, and people were just abstaining from
117
00:07:24,189 --> 00:07:27,311
voting because they just didn't think Hillary Clinton was the
118
00:07:27,351 --> 00:07:30,433
right candidate. They didn't like Donald J. Trump. And all of a
119
00:07:30,453 --> 00:07:33,715
sudden, they didn't vote. And people who didn't come out to vote You
120
00:07:33,735 --> 00:07:37,159
know, lots of the people who came out to vote and we saw a change in
121
00:07:37,199 --> 00:07:41,044
American history for, you know, several times. So now
122
00:07:41,144 --> 00:07:44,569
we're seeing that, hey, look, you know what? We're actually seeing,
123
00:07:44,589 --> 00:07:49,074
you know, activists ages ranging from 16 to 29. You
124
00:07:49,114 --> 00:07:52,316
know, this is huge. We're going to start to see
125
00:07:52,356 --> 00:07:56,359
people come out in droves. We're going to start to see these environmental networks that
126
00:07:56,439 --> 00:07:59,921
want big changes against climate change to vote somebody in who has
127
00:07:59,941 --> 00:08:03,183
a history of going up against big oil and gas companies and
128
00:08:03,223 --> 00:08:06,425
saying, no, we're not letting you get away with
129
00:08:06,485 --> 00:08:09,687
this. And I think that's the big appeal when
130
00:08:09,727 --> 00:08:13,049
it comes to Harris. And I think that's
131
00:08:13,089 --> 00:08:16,391
huge. Dana Fisher, director of the Center of Environment, Community, and Equity at
132
00:08:16,451 --> 00:08:19,853
American University said, it's not that young voters are
133
00:08:19,893 --> 00:08:23,455
ignoring Biden's work on climate, it's that they want to see more.
134
00:08:23,535 --> 00:08:26,657
So the young people know it's not enough because they recognize how severe the
135
00:08:26,717 --> 00:08:30,059
climate crisis is. This is a quote from Fisher, from Dana Fisher.
136
00:08:30,859 --> 00:08:34,862
And so We're constantly seeing this battle of
137
00:08:34,902 --> 00:08:38,064
like, how many votes can you get, right? That's what you want. You
138
00:08:38,104 --> 00:08:41,326
want as many people out as possible to get votes. And this is
139
00:08:41,446 --> 00:08:44,728
what you want. Like, this is how you want people to
140
00:08:44,829 --> 00:08:47,991
vote. And so that's sort of, and Dana Fisher, once she found
141
00:08:48,031 --> 00:08:51,373
out that people in environmental networks were saying, hey, you know what, don't even bother going
142
00:08:51,433 --> 00:08:54,895
on vote if it's going to be Biden or Trump. She was like, I
143
00:08:54,976 --> 00:08:58,138
was like, are you kidding me? This is a quote from Dana Fisher. Don't
144
00:08:58,158 --> 00:09:01,461
you remember what happened in 2000? She goes, of course not. They didn't
145
00:09:01,501 --> 00:09:04,744
remember because they probably weren't alive or they were in diapers. But it's very
146
00:09:04,804 --> 00:09:08,267
hard to have a long view when you're younger. So it's hard to like, you
147
00:09:08,287 --> 00:09:12,370
don't know if you're repeating past mistakes. But since Biden
148
00:09:12,410 --> 00:09:15,733
dropped out of the race, Fisher said the youth climate activists that
149
00:09:15,753 --> 00:09:18,936
she's talked to are more likely to vote, which is great. That's what we want to see.
150
00:09:19,656 --> 00:09:23,057
So Harris's young supporters have highlighted the settlements she secured as
151
00:09:23,137 --> 00:09:26,758
California Attorney General with Chevron, BP, and ConocoPhillips over
152
00:09:26,798 --> 00:09:29,979
their handling of hazardous materials. Now, when
153
00:09:29,999 --> 00:09:33,541
you go after and you try and stop oil companies,
154
00:09:34,341 --> 00:09:38,222
you've stopped them in the courts. That's how it's been done historically.
155
00:09:38,522 --> 00:09:41,703
You can protest and you can scream and
156
00:09:41,723 --> 00:09:44,908
yell at the top of your lungs. but to really get them
157
00:09:44,928 --> 00:10:00,155
to stop is through injunctions and suing the government. quite
158
00:10:00,195 --> 00:10:03,537
a bit. Then a number of organizations banded together, they
159
00:10:03,557 --> 00:10:06,678
had a coalition, including, I believe it was
160
00:10:06,698 --> 00:10:10,220
the Environmental Defense Fund, but don't quote me on that, but there were a number
161
00:10:10,260 --> 00:10:13,582
of environmental lawyers that sued the government, not
162
00:10:13,662 --> 00:10:16,803
the Shell or the oil company, but sued the
163
00:10:16,863 --> 00:10:20,125
government because they said that the
164
00:10:20,165 --> 00:10:24,527
government did not hold Shell to the proper accountability in
165
00:10:24,547 --> 00:10:27,830
the environmental assessment that they had to do before they
166
00:10:27,870 --> 00:10:31,033
were going to even think about drilling on the North Slope. So
167
00:10:31,313 --> 00:10:35,036
because they did that, they said they just breezed through some of the problems.
168
00:10:35,056 --> 00:10:38,759
And this is what happens quite often. If you don't get the right consulting
169
00:10:38,819 --> 00:10:42,081
firm, and organizations and oil
170
00:10:42,121 --> 00:10:45,324
companies are going to be like, hey, you know what? Let's just breeze over some
171
00:10:45,344 --> 00:10:48,927
of the ramifications, the consequences that can happen from drilling into wherever
172
00:10:48,947 --> 00:10:52,430
we're going to drill into and we'll just be able to do that. A good consulting firm
173
00:10:52,470 --> 00:10:55,533
is like, no, we're just going to look at everything and we're going to see and we're going to
174
00:10:55,573 --> 00:10:59,016
make the proper assessment so that we can cover all of our basis
175
00:10:59,056 --> 00:11:02,459
because the good consulting companies out there, environmental
176
00:11:02,499 --> 00:11:05,802
consulting companies out there that work with organizations and companies like oil
177
00:11:05,842 --> 00:11:09,024
companies, have to stay in the middle. At some part, they're
178
00:11:09,064 --> 00:11:12,326
part government. At some part, they're representing their clients. But they have to
179
00:11:12,406 --> 00:11:16,769
stay true to the science. They have to stay true to the conservation, not
180
00:11:16,809 --> 00:11:20,170
conversation, conservation. But that doesn't always happen. And in
181
00:11:20,210 --> 00:11:23,873
this case, it wasn't enough. And so the environmental lawyers
182
00:11:23,913 --> 00:11:27,815
were like, hey, let's go to the courts and let's get it. This is what Kamala
183
00:11:27,855 --> 00:11:31,697
Harris did when she was a prosecutor. She held the
184
00:11:32,457 --> 00:11:35,779
oil companies, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips, you
185
00:11:35,799 --> 00:11:39,041
know, to a higher standard. They held it to account for their
186
00:11:39,081 --> 00:11:42,584
mistakes and their, you know, not handling hazardous
187
00:11:42,604 --> 00:11:46,106
materials properly. Biden is a lot more moderate in
188
00:11:46,166 --> 00:11:50,429
terms of a policy approach, whereas Kamala is,
189
00:11:50,549 --> 00:11:54,091
isn't afraid to tackle environmental and climate policy
190
00:11:54,411 --> 00:11:58,374
in a way that really gets at the root, especially with polluters. This
191
00:11:58,434 --> 00:12:02,136
is said, Iris Zan, 20, 20 year
192
00:12:02,176 --> 00:12:05,698
old a youth advisory board member at the global youth storytelling
193
00:12:05,738 --> 00:12:09,400
and research lab which engages youth leaders in climate environmental justice
194
00:12:09,680 --> 00:12:13,302
research So Harris has brought up that early career work in
195
00:12:13,402 --> 00:12:16,744
some of her initial campaign appearances was great She even said
196
00:12:16,804 --> 00:12:19,946
as district attorney to go after polluters. I created one
197
00:12:19,966 --> 00:12:23,848
of the first environmental just environmental justice units in
198
00:12:23,948 --> 00:12:28,050
our nation. She said on July 22nd in Wilmington, Delaware, referring
199
00:12:28,070 --> 00:12:31,391
to her time as district attorney in San Francisco, Donald Trump stood in
200
00:12:31,431 --> 00:12:34,652
Mar-a-Lago and told big oil lobbyists he
201
00:12:34,692 --> 00:12:38,434
would do their bidding for a $1 billion campaign
202
00:12:38,494 --> 00:12:42,055
contribution. This is why we got to take money out of politics. And
203
00:12:42,115 --> 00:12:46,662
this is, you know, what continues to happen you
204
00:12:46,702 --> 00:12:50,285
know, in this race is you start to see
205
00:12:50,705 --> 00:12:53,988
that one side is very much pro-environment, the other side
206
00:12:54,048 --> 00:12:57,211
is very much pro-revenue and pro-business and
207
00:12:57,291 --> 00:13:00,794
pro-privatization of the environment. And,
208
00:13:00,814 --> 00:13:04,157
you know, allowing people to make hand over fist in terms of money
209
00:13:04,337 --> 00:13:07,519
and not pay the consequences for the consequences that they
210
00:13:07,620 --> 00:13:10,902
cause the rest of the people, not only in the U.S., but around
211
00:13:10,942 --> 00:13:14,244
the world. And so we're starting, you know, this article that I'm reading
212
00:13:14,304 --> 00:13:17,584
here and I'm going over as you can, as you can probably hear and tell or see
213
00:13:17,665 --> 00:13:21,205
if you're watching the video. It's a
214
00:13:21,606 --> 00:13:25,727
truth telling tale of how the environmental movement
215
00:13:26,307 --> 00:13:30,428
and the young movement is seeing this new candidate in
216
00:13:30,508 --> 00:13:33,827
Kamala Harris. this is something that
217
00:13:33,987 --> 00:13:37,189
is going to like you know motivate people to go out
218
00:13:37,249 --> 00:13:40,452
and vote for the environment which i think is
219
00:13:40,592 --> 00:13:43,894
is wonderful there's lots of reasons to vote on either side
220
00:13:43,934 --> 00:13:47,316
i'm not trying to pick a side here i have my side i'm
221
00:13:47,356 --> 00:13:50,839
not even american so i can't choose i can't vote But
222
00:13:51,319 --> 00:13:54,842
one tells me that, you know, the Democratic side is just more
223
00:13:55,262 --> 00:13:58,705
for protecting the environment, more for thinking straight when
224
00:13:58,745 --> 00:14:02,549
it comes to the environment, not rushing into things and paying the price after.
225
00:14:03,009 --> 00:14:06,351
And I think that's really important. So I think that's
226
00:14:06,511 --> 00:14:10,032
what's really good. However, something to realize is
227
00:14:10,112 --> 00:14:13,333
that although Harris said in 2019 that
228
00:14:13,413 --> 00:14:16,554
she would be against fracking if elected president, she no
229
00:14:16,594 --> 00:14:19,715
longer supports a ban. And Dana Fisher says she
230
00:14:19,795 --> 00:14:23,496
doesn't want to turn off people from the fossil fuel extracting
231
00:14:23,536 --> 00:14:26,597
states. She's not going to end up as
232
00:14:27,557 --> 00:14:31,238
a progressive platform as she had when she was in California,
233
00:14:31,618 --> 00:14:34,704
However, she is going to be more progressive than Biden. Is
234
00:14:34,724 --> 00:14:37,890
she going to be more progressive than Biden? I expect she will be.
235
00:14:37,930 --> 00:14:41,296
This is a quote from Dana Fisher. So look, we're starting
236
00:14:41,337 --> 00:14:44,718
to see. this start
237
00:14:44,738 --> 00:14:48,741
to turn more towards people versus
238
00:14:48,921 --> 00:14:52,264
like people about policy. That's what people want. It's back
239
00:14:52,324 --> 00:14:55,687
towards policy. It's not choosing which is the worst
240
00:14:55,727 --> 00:14:59,449
of evil. It's choose who's putting up the best policy.
241
00:14:59,890 --> 00:15:03,132
And if you look at the speeches, you're gonna
242
00:15:03,152 --> 00:15:06,575
start to notice a lot more policy being put into place to say, hey, look,
243
00:15:07,156 --> 00:15:10,598
Kamala Harris represents this. Governor Watts
244
00:15:10,738 --> 00:15:14,067
represents this. Sorry, I don't remember Watts' first name. This is
245
00:15:14,347 --> 00:15:17,828
all about policy, and that's what the election should
246
00:15:17,868 --> 00:15:21,170
be about. It's about policy, not about personal name-calling, not
247
00:15:21,190 --> 00:15:24,351
about what they've done in the past. It's all about who
248
00:15:24,391 --> 00:15:28,132
would represent you best as a leader for the U.S., and
249
00:15:28,172 --> 00:15:31,793
that's what you should go on. Look at the policy. And if you're listening
250
00:15:31,813 --> 00:15:35,314
to this podcast and you want something for the environment, you
251
00:15:35,354 --> 00:15:38,556
kind of know which way you should be leaning. I'm not trying to tell you which
252
00:15:38,636 --> 00:15:41,840
way you should be leaning or which way you should vote. But if you're for the
253
00:15:41,880 --> 00:15:45,063
environment, there's clearly one party that's ahead of the other. In fact, like
254
00:15:45,083 --> 00:15:48,367
they're even criticizing their own president that's a Democrat to
255
00:15:48,427 --> 00:15:52,331
say that president didn't do enough and people want
256
00:15:52,751 --> 00:15:55,874
holding him accountable by not. You know, not saying he's going to
257
00:15:55,894 --> 00:15:59,455
be the nominee for the next year, but it's going to be Kamala Harris, who's
258
00:15:59,555 --> 00:16:03,696
got a track record going up against big oil. She's not afraid. She's
259
00:16:03,796 --> 00:16:07,217
brave in this kind of way. She stands straight up to them and says, no,
260
00:16:07,417 --> 00:16:10,939
absolutely not. You're not going to get away with breaking the law. And that's final.
261
00:16:11,319 --> 00:16:15,080
And I think that's going to be a huge thing. to
262
00:16:15,180 --> 00:16:18,961
see in the future. So that's it for today's episode.
263
00:16:18,981 --> 00:16:22,703
I just wanted to let you know, when it comes to Kamala
264
00:16:22,743 --> 00:16:26,224
Harris as a presidential candidate for
265
00:16:26,264 --> 00:16:29,685
the Democratic Party, we're starting to see more
266
00:16:29,725 --> 00:16:33,066
and more environmental policy pop up. And that's great
267
00:16:33,106 --> 00:16:36,527
to hear. And we'll see, time will be tested,
268
00:16:36,567 --> 00:16:40,008
and time will tell whether we are going to see more
269
00:16:40,489 --> 00:16:43,750
fossil fuel projects approved, no matter who gets
270
00:16:43,830 --> 00:16:46,998
in. right? That's dangerous. We can't have
271
00:16:47,018 --> 00:16:50,099
that anymore. We can't have any new, you know, projects. And
272
00:16:50,119 --> 00:16:53,200
the reason why, well, there's a number of reasons why, but the
273
00:16:53,220 --> 00:16:56,962
main reason why is all that production is not going to go into production for another like 30 to
274
00:16:57,342 --> 00:17:00,563
50 years. So what are we doing here? What are we really thinking about?
275
00:17:01,063 --> 00:17:04,664
and how much more oil do we have, and where's
276
00:17:04,724 --> 00:17:08,565
all that gonna go? How's that all gonna be used? We're gonna be talking about a lot of that in
277
00:17:08,585 --> 00:17:11,746
the future as it comes up, but this I wanted to just kinda let
278
00:17:11,786 --> 00:17:15,247
you know, people are talking about the election. I try
279
00:17:15,287 --> 00:17:18,807
and stay away, but obviously I'm a little biased towards the environment, towards
280
00:17:18,867 --> 00:17:21,988
parties that support the environment, and that's what
281
00:17:22,028 --> 00:17:25,549
we're seeing here. And I think it's really nice to have that
282
00:17:26,229 --> 00:17:29,511
extra energy coming into a campaign. I think it's great to
283
00:17:29,551 --> 00:17:33,973
have that environmental energy coming to a campaign and really stirring
284
00:17:34,073 --> 00:17:37,455
up the environmental community to be like, hey, this is really good.
285
00:17:37,515 --> 00:17:41,477
We have an option here to have better environmental policy
286
00:17:41,677 --> 00:17:45,138
on the already great policy that we have now.
287
00:17:45,499 --> 00:17:48,660
It can be improved. Let's improve it and let's go. So
288
00:17:48,700 --> 00:17:52,061
that's it for today's episode. If you want to hear more news and
289
00:17:52,701 --> 00:17:55,742
you can't get it all from this podcast, you can sign up for our newsletter. If you go
290
00:17:55,762 --> 00:17:59,102
to speakupforblue.com forward slash newsletter, I send an
291
00:17:59,242 --> 00:18:02,383
email every Monday to Friday. You're going to get an
292
00:18:02,443 --> 00:18:05,584
email in your inbox in the morning. You get three stories that I
293
00:18:05,644 --> 00:18:09,725
found that I think is interesting you should be talking about in terms of marine science and conservation, as
294
00:18:09,785 --> 00:18:13,346
well as you get some job opportunities that I found online
295
00:18:13,366 --> 00:18:16,628
and on LinkedIn. And yeah, and you get all the latest
296
00:18:16,668 --> 00:18:20,430
podcasts that we produce here on the Speak Up for Blue Network. So it's
297
00:18:20,510 --> 00:18:23,713
a lot of fun, a lot of stuff going on. But I want to thank you so much for
298
00:18:23,753 --> 00:18:27,335
joining me on today's episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast. Oh,
299
00:18:27,615 --> 00:18:30,817
I almost forgot. If you want to get a hold of me, you can go on Spotify, leave
300
00:18:30,837 --> 00:18:34,200
a comment. You can go on YouTube, leave a comment. I answer as
301
00:18:34,280 --> 00:18:37,562
many as I can. And of course, you can
302
00:18:37,622 --> 00:18:40,844
go to Instagram at How to Protect the Ocean and send
303
00:18:40,884 --> 00:18:44,131
me a DM. Thank you so much for joining me on today's episode of the How to Protect
304
00:18:44,171 --> 00:18:47,499
the Ocean podcast. I'm your host, Andrew Lewin. Have a great day. We'll talk to you next time,
00:00:00,188 --> 00:00:03,470
If you think President Biden was good for climate change and
2
00:00:03,490 --> 00:00:06,912
the environment by passing the Inflation Reduction Act, well,
3
00:00:06,993 --> 00:00:10,455
a lot of environmentalists in the U.S. think that P.P.
4
00:00:10,495 --> 00:00:13,837
Harris will actually be better. And
5
00:00:13,857 --> 00:00:17,800
we're going to talk about why on this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast. Let's
6
00:00:17,820 --> 00:00:23,143
start the show. Hey
7
00:00:23,183 --> 00:00:26,587
everybody, welcome back to another exciting episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast. I'm
8
00:00:26,607 --> 00:00:29,790
your host Andrew Lewin, and this is the podcast where you find out what's happening with
9
00:00:29,830 --> 00:00:33,194
the ocean, how you can speak up for the ocean, and what you can do to live for
10
00:00:33,214 --> 00:00:36,537
a better ocean by taking action. And on today's episode, we're
11
00:00:36,557 --> 00:00:39,801
going to be talking about action taking from a policy perspective. And
12
00:00:40,121 --> 00:00:43,883
look, it's all on your news feeds, it's on your TV,
13
00:00:43,963 --> 00:00:48,265
you can't get away from it, it's on the radio, it's on podcasts. We're
14
00:00:48,285 --> 00:00:51,546
gonna talk about the presidential debate. I know last
15
00:00:51,586 --> 00:00:55,387
time I talked about politics, I said, we're not gonna talk about the presidential debate.
16
00:00:55,727 --> 00:00:59,528
But there is a significant difference in the parties
17
00:00:59,748 --> 00:01:03,350
and their approach towards doing something about climate
18
00:01:03,390 --> 00:01:06,751
change. And if you wanna know how both parties
19
00:01:06,811 --> 00:01:10,872
are doing, on one side you have the Republicans, who
20
00:01:11,092 --> 00:01:16,195
are rumored and even, I guess, the VP candidate
21
00:01:16,275 --> 00:01:19,437
for the Republicans, Vance, J.D. Vance, has
22
00:01:19,477 --> 00:01:22,959
come out, or not has come out, but actually wrote
23
00:01:22,979 --> 00:01:26,481
the forward, I believe, for Project 2025, a
24
00:01:26,581 --> 00:01:30,203
notorious bill or a notorious plan of action that
25
00:01:31,524 --> 00:01:35,346
some Republicans think that Donald Trump should take when
26
00:01:35,366 --> 00:01:39,088
and if he gets into the presidency. And
27
00:01:39,849 --> 00:01:43,171
if you want to know how that's going to affect the environment, I'm going to link to
28
00:01:43,211 --> 00:01:46,292
an article on LinkedIn by a good friend of mine, doctor, or
29
00:01:46,333 --> 00:01:50,535
doctor, should be a doctor, Angelo Villa Gomez. He
30
00:01:50,595 --> 00:01:54,577
put out just all the resources you need to know how the
31
00:01:54,677 --> 00:01:58,199
Project 2025 is going to affect climate change,
32
00:01:58,239 --> 00:02:01,601
fossil fuels, Environmental Protection Agency, NOAA, Ocean
33
00:02:01,621 --> 00:02:06,304
Conservation, NOAA Weather Service, Department of Interior, Antiquities
34
00:02:06,444 --> 00:02:09,966
Act, public lands, wildlife and migratory birds.
35
00:02:29,380 --> 00:02:32,602
and also reduce inflation. And it's an act that is
36
00:02:33,122 --> 00:02:36,344
probably the most progressive act. It has been touted as the most
37
00:02:36,385 --> 00:02:40,147
pervasive act to
38
00:02:40,227 --> 00:02:44,169
fight climate change than we've ever seen before. However, a
39
00:02:44,229 --> 00:02:47,732
lot of environmentalists and a lot of environmental organizations in
40
00:02:47,752 --> 00:02:51,414
the US and outside the US have criticized the Biden administration for
41
00:02:51,494 --> 00:02:55,476
not doing enough. and so especially young
42
00:02:55,516 --> 00:02:58,737
environmentalists, and they want to see more action. And
43
00:02:58,777 --> 00:03:02,138
they also pointed out that Harris's record, Kamala Harris's
44
00:03:02,218 --> 00:03:06,260
record for prosecuting oil companies and her co-sponsorship of
45
00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:09,501
the Green New Deal are reasons for her to be, that
46
00:03:09,561 --> 00:03:12,962
she will be a better president for the environment than
47
00:03:13,162 --> 00:03:16,683
President Biden. So there's a lot of excitement in the air. Look, it's
48
00:03:16,723 --> 00:03:20,104
been about a week since, a little over a week that
49
00:03:20,144 --> 00:03:23,406
you're hearing, since you're hearing this, that uh... washington like this
50
00:03:23,446 --> 00:03:26,928
is two weeks that uh... kamala harris vp kamala harris has
51
00:03:26,968 --> 00:03:30,251
been named as the presidential candidate for uh...
52
00:03:30,811 --> 00:03:34,333
the democrats uh... and uh... she has injected a
53
00:03:34,373 --> 00:03:37,735
lot of excitement she got actually quickly became uh...
54
00:03:38,616 --> 00:03:41,898
the nominee with the amount of money that she raised from
55
00:03:41,918 --> 00:03:45,821
a lot of different groups people are happy people are in our energize
56
00:03:45,861 --> 00:03:49,263
their is this sort of new
57
00:03:49,363 --> 00:03:53,187
sort of look on the presidential campaign. You could see it before
58
00:03:53,307 --> 00:03:56,910
when Biden was still running and it ran against Donald
59
00:03:56,930 --> 00:04:00,174
Trump that you know he was people were not excited
60
00:04:00,194 --> 00:04:03,457
people like are you serious this is these are the only two out
61
00:04:03,497 --> 00:04:06,620
of the population of over 350 million these are the only two people that we
62
00:04:06,660 --> 00:04:09,941
get to choose from. People were a little distraught. They were distraught not
63
00:04:10,002 --> 00:04:13,402
only at Donald Trump and his antics, but they're distraught by you know,
64
00:04:13,542 --> 00:04:16,783
President Biden in his antics, you know, he's looks old.
65
00:04:17,023 --> 00:04:20,584
He looks older. He looks like he's having trouble, you
66
00:04:20,604 --> 00:04:24,025
know, putting words together during speeches. His the last debate
67
00:04:24,065 --> 00:04:27,446
he did with Donald Trump was not very good. And so people were
68
00:04:27,486 --> 00:04:31,246
concerned and a lot of people in the Democrats were very concerned. And
69
00:04:31,306 --> 00:04:34,707
so that's when, you know, we started to see this shift
70
00:04:34,747 --> 00:04:38,728
and started to see, hey, you know, Kamala Harris is going to be the
71
00:04:38,788 --> 00:04:42,110
next presidential nominee. And nobody believed it. It was a long shot
72
00:04:42,150 --> 00:04:45,472
because President Biden had to be the one that was going
73
00:04:45,532 --> 00:04:48,653
to say no when he finally did it. Whether he wanted to do it or
74
00:04:48,713 --> 00:04:51,915
not, he did it. And there's just been this new energy that
75
00:04:52,215 --> 00:04:55,457
in the election itself. The Republicans are trying to
76
00:04:55,537 --> 00:04:58,978
figure out what to do. They were attacking Biden for his
77
00:04:59,258 --> 00:05:02,659
age and the fact that he was messing up words and messing up people's
78
00:05:02,739 --> 00:05:06,260
names as he was introducing them, calling President
79
00:05:06,980 --> 00:05:10,782
Zelensky, who's Ukrainian, President Putin, who's
80
00:05:10,862 --> 00:05:14,883
Russian and trying to invade, is invading his country. Obviously,
81
00:05:15,043 --> 00:05:18,424
not a good sign. And so now with
82
00:05:18,564 --> 00:05:22,106
Kamala Harris in as the nominee and
83
00:05:22,206 --> 00:05:25,500
as the candidate, you know, holy cow, like this is,
84
00:05:25,640 --> 00:05:28,923
this has changed. And, you know, just as I'm recording this
85
00:05:28,983 --> 00:05:32,746
episode, it's been about a day since they, I
86
00:05:32,806 --> 00:05:36,589
believe it's Watts is his name, the VP candidate
87
00:05:36,689 --> 00:05:40,011
for the Harris ticket. He's going to be on the ticket. He's
88
00:05:40,031 --> 00:05:43,254
going to be, if she gets elected president, he will
89
00:05:43,294 --> 00:05:46,668
be the next vice president. And, but What's
90
00:05:46,728 --> 00:05:49,810
going back, and let's get away from that, and let's go into sort of
91
00:05:49,890 --> 00:05:53,153
her record against oil and
92
00:05:53,173 --> 00:05:56,575
gas companies, and why people
93
00:05:56,635 --> 00:06:00,218
are really following her. So representatives from 11 organizations devoted to elevating
94
00:06:00,278 --> 00:06:03,760
young voters' concerns about climate change said Harris's record
95
00:06:03,780 --> 00:06:07,322
of going after big oil companies as a prosecutor and
96
00:06:07,383 --> 00:06:11,425
her co-sponsorship of the Green New Deal as a senator make
97
00:06:11,505 --> 00:06:14,727
her a more appealing candidate than Biden despite his
98
00:06:14,787 --> 00:06:18,268
environmental wins. So it's not saying that Biden was bad, just Biden over
99
00:06:18,308 --> 00:06:21,570
the last little bit has approved oil
100
00:06:21,590 --> 00:06:24,971
and gas projects that were not expected to be approved and had
101
00:06:25,011 --> 00:06:28,473
a lot of controversy surrounding it. But when it comes to Harris,
102
00:06:28,573 --> 00:06:31,776
she has a history around holding big oil accountable in
103
00:06:31,816 --> 00:06:34,939
a way that we haven't seen and haven't been able to do for the
104
00:06:34,979 --> 00:06:39,083
last four years. This is said by Aru Shiniaeji, a
105
00:06:39,103 --> 00:06:42,626
26-year-old that's the executive director of the Sunrise Movement, which pushes
106
00:06:43,247 --> 00:06:46,770
for government interventions to address climate change. And
107
00:06:46,790 --> 00:06:50,372
the Green New Deal Network, a coalition of 19 progressive environmental and
108
00:06:50,432 --> 00:06:54,133
social justice organizations, including the Sunrise Movement, endorsed Harris
109
00:06:54,173 --> 00:06:57,694
this week, but had not previously issued an endorsement for
110
00:06:57,794 --> 00:07:01,316
Biden. So having these young
111
00:07:01,536 --> 00:07:05,598
environmentalists as part of the endorsement really
112
00:07:05,658 --> 00:07:08,920
helps the environmental movement. They represent a lot of people. And at one
113
00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:12,802
point, they were telling members, when Biden was president, they were telling members, we're
114
00:07:12,842 --> 00:07:16,184
just telling them not to vote, which is something you don't want to do, because that
115
00:07:16,264 --> 00:07:20,987
happened in 2016 when Donald
116
00:07:21,007 --> 00:07:24,129
Trump became president, and people were just abstaining from
117
00:07:24,189 --> 00:07:27,311
voting because they just didn't think Hillary Clinton was the
118
00:07:27,351 --> 00:07:30,433
right candidate. They didn't like Donald J. Trump. And all of a
119
00:07:30,453 --> 00:07:33,715
sudden, they didn't vote. And people who didn't come out to vote You
120
00:07:33,735 --> 00:07:37,159
know, lots of the people who came out to vote and we saw a change in
121
00:07:37,199 --> 00:07:41,044
American history for, you know, several times. So now
122
00:07:41,144 --> 00:07:44,569
we're seeing that, hey, look, you know what? We're actually seeing,
123
00:07:44,589 --> 00:07:49,074
you know, activists ages ranging from 16 to 29. You
124
00:07:49,114 --> 00:07:52,316
know, this is huge. We're going to start to see
125
00:07:52,356 --> 00:07:56,359
people come out in droves. We're going to start to see these environmental networks that
126
00:07:56,439 --> 00:07:59,921
want big changes against climate change to vote somebody in who has
127
00:07:59,941 --> 00:08:03,183
a history of going up against big oil and gas companies and
128
00:08:03,223 --> 00:08:06,425
saying, no, we're not letting you get away with
129
00:08:06,485 --> 00:08:09,687
this. And I think that's the big appeal when
130
00:08:09,727 --> 00:08:13,049
it comes to Harris. And I think that's
131
00:08:13,089 --> 00:08:16,391
huge. Dana Fisher, director of the Center of Environment, Community, and Equity at
132
00:08:16,451 --> 00:08:19,853
American University said, it's not that young voters are
133
00:08:19,893 --> 00:08:23,455
ignoring Biden's work on climate, it's that they want to see more.
134
00:08:23,535 --> 00:08:26,657
So the young people know it's not enough because they recognize how severe the
135
00:08:26,717 --> 00:08:30,059
climate crisis is. This is a quote from Fisher, from Dana Fisher.
136
00:08:30,859 --> 00:08:34,862
And so We're constantly seeing this battle of
137
00:08:34,902 --> 00:08:38,064
like, how many votes can you get, right? That's what you want. You
138
00:08:38,104 --> 00:08:41,326
want as many people out as possible to get votes. And this is
139
00:08:41,446 --> 00:08:44,728
what you want. Like, this is how you want people to
140
00:08:44,829 --> 00:08:47,991
vote. And so that's sort of, and Dana Fisher, once she found
141
00:08:48,031 --> 00:08:51,373
out that people in environmental networks were saying, hey, you know what, don't even bother going
142
00:08:51,433 --> 00:08:54,895
on vote if it's going to be Biden or Trump. She was like, I
143
00:08:54,976 --> 00:08:58,138
was like, are you kidding me? This is a quote from Dana Fisher. Don't
144
00:08:58,158 --> 00:09:01,461
you remember what happened in 2000? She goes, of course not. They didn't
145
00:09:01,501 --> 00:09:04,744
remember because they probably weren't alive or they were in diapers. But it's very
146
00:09:04,804 --> 00:09:08,267
hard to have a long view when you're younger. So it's hard to like, you
147
00:09:08,287 --> 00:09:12,370
don't know if you're repeating past mistakes. But since Biden
148
00:09:12,410 --> 00:09:15,733
dropped out of the race, Fisher said the youth climate activists that
149
00:09:15,753 --> 00:09:18,936
she's talked to are more likely to vote, which is great. That's what we want to see.
150
00:09:19,656 --> 00:09:23,057
So Harris's young supporters have highlighted the settlements she secured as
151
00:09:23,137 --> 00:09:26,758
California Attorney General with Chevron, BP, and ConocoPhillips over
152
00:09:26,798 --> 00:09:29,979
their handling of hazardous materials. Now, when
153
00:09:29,999 --> 00:09:33,541
you go after and you try and stop oil companies,
154
00:09:34,341 --> 00:09:38,222
you've stopped them in the courts. That's how it's been done historically.
155
00:09:38,522 --> 00:09:41,703
You can protest and you can scream and
156
00:09:41,723 --> 00:09:44,908
yell at the top of your lungs. but to really get them
157
00:09:44,928 --> 00:10:00,155
to stop is through injunctions and suing the government. quite
158
00:10:00,195 --> 00:10:03,537
a bit. Then a number of organizations banded together, they
159
00:10:03,557 --> 00:10:06,678
had a coalition, including, I believe it was
160
00:10:06,698 --> 00:10:10,220
the Environmental Defense Fund, but don't quote me on that, but there were a number
161
00:10:10,260 --> 00:10:13,582
of environmental lawyers that sued the government, not
162
00:10:13,662 --> 00:10:16,803
the Shell or the oil company, but sued the
163
00:10:16,863 --> 00:10:20,125
government because they said that the
164
00:10:20,165 --> 00:10:24,527
government did not hold Shell to the proper accountability in
165
00:10:24,547 --> 00:10:27,830
the environmental assessment that they had to do before they
166
00:10:27,870 --> 00:10:31,033
were going to even think about drilling on the North Slope. So
167
00:10:31,313 --> 00:10:35,036
because they did that, they said they just breezed through some of the problems.
168
00:10:35,056 --> 00:10:38,759
And this is what happens quite often. If you don't get the right consulting
169
00:10:38,819 --> 00:10:42,081
firm, and organizations and oil
170
00:10:42,121 --> 00:10:45,324
companies are going to be like, hey, you know what? Let's just breeze over some
171
00:10:45,344 --> 00:10:48,927
of the ramifications, the consequences that can happen from drilling into wherever
172
00:10:48,947 --> 00:10:52,430
we're going to drill into and we'll just be able to do that. A good consulting firm
173
00:10:52,470 --> 00:10:55,533
is like, no, we're just going to look at everything and we're going to see and we're going to
174
00:10:55,573 --> 00:10:59,016
make the proper assessment so that we can cover all of our basis
175
00:10:59,056 --> 00:11:02,459
because the good consulting companies out there, environmental
176
00:11:02,499 --> 00:11:05,802
consulting companies out there that work with organizations and companies like oil
177
00:11:05,842 --> 00:11:09,024
companies, have to stay in the middle. At some part, they're
178
00:11:09,064 --> 00:11:12,326
part government. At some part, they're representing their clients. But they have to
179
00:11:12,406 --> 00:11:16,769
stay true to the science. They have to stay true to the conservation, not
180
00:11:16,809 --> 00:11:20,170
conversation, conservation. But that doesn't always happen. And in
181
00:11:20,210 --> 00:11:23,873
this case, it wasn't enough. And so the environmental lawyers
182
00:11:23,913 --> 00:11:27,815
were like, hey, let's go to the courts and let's get it. This is what Kamala
183
00:11:27,855 --> 00:11:31,697
Harris did when she was a prosecutor. She held the
184
00:11:32,457 --> 00:11:35,779
oil companies, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips, you
185
00:11:35,799 --> 00:11:39,041
know, to a higher standard. They held it to account for their
186
00:11:39,081 --> 00:11:42,584
mistakes and their, you know, not handling hazardous
187
00:11:42,604 --> 00:11:46,106
materials properly. Biden is a lot more moderate in
188
00:11:46,166 --> 00:11:50,429
terms of a policy approach, whereas Kamala is,
189
00:11:50,549 --> 00:11:54,091
isn't afraid to tackle environmental and climate policy
190
00:11:54,411 --> 00:11:58,374
in a way that really gets at the root, especially with polluters. This
191
00:11:58,434 --> 00:12:02,136
is said, Iris Zan, 20, 20 year
192
00:12:02,176 --> 00:12:05,698
old a youth advisory board member at the global youth storytelling
193
00:12:05,738 --> 00:12:09,400
and research lab which engages youth leaders in climate environmental justice
194
00:12:09,680 --> 00:12:13,302
research So Harris has brought up that early career work in
195
00:12:13,402 --> 00:12:16,744
some of her initial campaign appearances was great She even said
196
00:12:16,804 --> 00:12:19,946
as district attorney to go after polluters. I created one
197
00:12:19,966 --> 00:12:23,848
of the first environmental just environmental justice units in
198
00:12:23,948 --> 00:12:28,050
our nation. She said on July 22nd in Wilmington, Delaware, referring
199
00:12:28,070 --> 00:12:31,391
to her time as district attorney in San Francisco, Donald Trump stood in
200
00:12:31,431 --> 00:12:34,652
Mar-a-Lago and told big oil lobbyists he
201
00:12:34,692 --> 00:12:38,434
would do their bidding for a $1 billion campaign
202
00:12:38,494 --> 00:12:42,055
contribution. This is why we got to take money out of politics. And
203
00:12:42,115 --> 00:12:46,662
this is, you know, what continues to happen you
204
00:12:46,702 --> 00:12:50,285
know, in this race is you start to see
205
00:12:50,705 --> 00:12:53,988
that one side is very much pro-environment, the other side
206
00:12:54,048 --> 00:12:57,211
is very much pro-revenue and pro-business and
207
00:12:57,291 --> 00:13:00,794
pro-privatization of the environment. And,
208
00:13:00,814 --> 00:13:04,157
you know, allowing people to make hand over fist in terms of money
209
00:13:04,337 --> 00:13:07,519
and not pay the consequences for the consequences that they
210
00:13:07,620 --> 00:13:10,902
cause the rest of the people, not only in the U.S., but around
211
00:13:10,942 --> 00:13:14,244
the world. And so we're starting, you know, this article that I'm reading
212
00:13:14,304 --> 00:13:17,584
here and I'm going over as you can, as you can probably hear and tell or see
213
00:13:17,665 --> 00:13:21,205
if you're watching the video. It's a
214
00:13:21,606 --> 00:13:25,727
truth telling tale of how the environmental movement
215
00:13:26,307 --> 00:13:30,428
and the young movement is seeing this new candidate in
216
00:13:30,508 --> 00:13:33,827
Kamala Harris. this is something that
217
00:13:33,987 --> 00:13:37,189
is going to like you know motivate people to go out
218
00:13:37,249 --> 00:13:40,452
and vote for the environment which i think is
219
00:13:40,592 --> 00:13:43,894
is wonderful there's lots of reasons to vote on either side
220
00:13:43,934 --> 00:13:47,316
i'm not trying to pick a side here i have my side i'm
221
00:13:47,356 --> 00:13:50,839
not even american so i can't choose i can't vote But
222
00:13:51,319 --> 00:13:54,842
one tells me that, you know, the Democratic side is just more
223
00:13:55,262 --> 00:13:58,705
for protecting the environment, more for thinking straight when
224
00:13:58,745 --> 00:14:02,549
it comes to the environment, not rushing into things and paying the price after.
225
00:14:03,009 --> 00:14:06,351
And I think that's really important. So I think that's
226
00:14:06,511 --> 00:14:10,032
what's really good. However, something to realize is
227
00:14:10,112 --> 00:14:13,333
that although Harris said in 2019 that
228
00:14:13,413 --> 00:14:16,554
she would be against fracking if elected president, she no
229
00:14:16,594 --> 00:14:19,715
longer supports a ban. And Dana Fisher says she
230
00:14:19,795 --> 00:14:23,496
doesn't want to turn off people from the fossil fuel extracting
231
00:14:23,536 --> 00:14:26,597
states. She's not going to end up as
232
00:14:27,557 --> 00:14:31,238
a progressive platform as she had when she was in California,
233
00:14:31,618 --> 00:14:34,704
However, she is going to be more progressive than Biden. Is
234
00:14:34,724 --> 00:14:37,890
she going to be more progressive than Biden? I expect she will be.
235
00:14:37,930 --> 00:14:41,296
This is a quote from Dana Fisher. So look, we're starting
236
00:14:41,337 --> 00:14:44,718
to see. this start
237
00:14:44,738 --> 00:14:48,741
to turn more towards people versus
238
00:14:48,921 --> 00:14:52,264
like people about policy. That's what people want. It's back
239
00:14:52,324 --> 00:14:55,687
towards policy. It's not choosing which is the worst
240
00:14:55,727 --> 00:14:59,449
of evil. It's choose who's putting up the best policy.
241
00:14:59,890 --> 00:15:03,132
And if you look at the speeches, you're gonna
242
00:15:03,152 --> 00:15:06,575
start to notice a lot more policy being put into place to say, hey, look,
243
00:15:07,156 --> 00:15:10,598
Kamala Harris represents this. Governor Watts
244
00:15:10,738 --> 00:15:14,067
represents this. Sorry, I don't remember Watts' first name. This is
245
00:15:14,347 --> 00:15:17,828
all about policy, and that's what the election should
246
00:15:17,868 --> 00:15:21,170
be about. It's about policy, not about personal name-calling, not
247
00:15:21,190 --> 00:15:24,351
about what they've done in the past. It's all about who
248
00:15:24,391 --> 00:15:28,132
would represent you best as a leader for the U.S., and
249
00:15:28,172 --> 00:15:31,793
that's what you should go on. Look at the policy. And if you're listening
250
00:15:31,813 --> 00:15:35,314
to this podcast and you want something for the environment, you
251
00:15:35,354 --> 00:15:38,556
kind of know which way you should be leaning. I'm not trying to tell you which
252
00:15:38,636 --> 00:15:41,840
way you should be leaning or which way you should vote. But if you're for the
253
00:15:41,880 --> 00:15:45,063
environment, there's clearly one party that's ahead of the other. In fact, like
254
00:15:45,083 --> 00:15:48,367
they're even criticizing their own president that's a Democrat to
255
00:15:48,427 --> 00:15:52,331
say that president didn't do enough and people want
256
00:15:52,751 --> 00:15:55,874
holding him accountable by not. You know, not saying he's going to
257
00:15:55,894 --> 00:15:59,455
be the nominee for the next year, but it's going to be Kamala Harris, who's
258
00:15:59,555 --> 00:16:03,696
got a track record going up against big oil. She's not afraid. She's
259
00:16:03,796 --> 00:16:07,217
brave in this kind of way. She stands straight up to them and says, no,
260
00:16:07,417 --> 00:16:10,939
absolutely not. You're not going to get away with breaking the law. And that's final.
261
00:16:11,319 --> 00:16:15,080
And I think that's going to be a huge thing. to
262
00:16:15,180 --> 00:16:18,961
see in the future. So that's it for today's episode.
263
00:16:18,981 --> 00:16:22,703
I just wanted to let you know, when it comes to Kamala
264
00:16:22,743 --> 00:16:26,224
Harris as a presidential candidate for
265
00:16:26,264 --> 00:16:29,685
the Democratic Party, we're starting to see more
266
00:16:29,725 --> 00:16:33,066
and more environmental policy pop up. And that's great
267
00:16:33,106 --> 00:16:36,527
to hear. And we'll see, time will be tested,
268
00:16:36,567 --> 00:16:40,008
and time will tell whether we are going to see more
269
00:16:40,489 --> 00:16:43,750
fossil fuel projects approved, no matter who gets
270
00:16:43,830 --> 00:16:46,998
in. right? That's dangerous. We can't have
271
00:16:47,018 --> 00:16:50,099
that anymore. We can't have any new, you know, projects. And
272
00:16:50,119 --> 00:16:53,200
the reason why, well, there's a number of reasons why, but the
273
00:16:53,220 --> 00:16:56,962
main reason why is all that production is not going to go into production for another like 30 to
274
00:16:57,342 --> 00:17:00,563
50 years. So what are we doing here? What are we really thinking about?
275
00:17:01,063 --> 00:17:04,664
and how much more oil do we have, and where's
276
00:17:04,724 --> 00:17:08,565
all that gonna go? How's that all gonna be used? We're gonna be talking about a lot of that in
277
00:17:08,585 --> 00:17:11,746
the future as it comes up, but this I wanted to just kinda let
278
00:17:11,786 --> 00:17:15,247
you know, people are talking about the election. I try
279
00:17:15,287 --> 00:17:18,807
and stay away, but obviously I'm a little biased towards the environment, towards
280
00:17:18,867 --> 00:17:21,988
parties that support the environment, and that's what
281
00:17:22,028 --> 00:17:25,549
we're seeing here. And I think it's really nice to have that
282
00:17:26,229 --> 00:17:29,511
extra energy coming into a campaign. I think it's great to
283
00:17:29,551 --> 00:17:33,973
have that environmental energy coming to a campaign and really stirring
284
00:17:34,073 --> 00:17:37,455
up the environmental community to be like, hey, this is really good.
285
00:17:37,515 --> 00:17:41,477
We have an option here to have better environmental policy
286
00:17:41,677 --> 00:17:45,138
on the already great policy that we have now.
287
00:17:45,499 --> 00:17:48,660
It can be improved. Let's improve it and let's go. So
288
00:17:48,700 --> 00:17:52,061
that's it for today's episode. If you want to hear more news and
289
00:17:52,701 --> 00:17:55,742
you can't get it all from this podcast, you can sign up for our newsletter. If you go
290
00:17:55,762 --> 00:17:59,102
to speakupforblue.com forward slash newsletter, I send an
291
00:17:59,242 --> 00:18:02,383
email every Monday to Friday. You're going to get an
292
00:18:02,443 --> 00:18:05,584
email in your inbox in the morning. You get three stories that I
293
00:18:05,644 --> 00:18:09,725
found that I think is interesting you should be talking about in terms of marine science and conservation, as
294
00:18:09,785 --> 00:18:13,346
well as you get some job opportunities that I found online
295
00:18:13,366 --> 00:18:16,628
and on LinkedIn. And yeah, and you get all the latest
296
00:18:16,668 --> 00:18:20,430
podcasts that we produce here on the Speak Up for Blue Network. So it's
297
00:18:20,510 --> 00:18:23,713
a lot of fun, a lot of stuff going on. But I want to thank you so much for
298
00:18:23,753 --> 00:18:27,335
joining me on today's episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast. Oh,
299
00:18:27,615 --> 00:18:30,817
I almost forgot. If you want to get a hold of me, you can go on Spotify, leave
300
00:18:30,837 --> 00:18:34,200
a comment. You can go on YouTube, leave a comment. I answer as
301
00:18:34,280 --> 00:18:37,562
many as I can. And of course, you can
302
00:18:37,622 --> 00:18:40,844
go to Instagram at How to Protect the Ocean and send
303
00:18:40,884 --> 00:18:44,131
me a DM. Thank you so much for joining me on today's episode of the How to Protect
304
00:18:44,171 --> 00:18:47,499
the Ocean podcast. I'm your host, Andrew Lewin. Have a great day. We'll talk to you next time,
Listen On
Support On
