Shark finning regulations have not helped decrease the amount of shark deaths. The regulations called for fishers to bring back the sharks with the fins on to decrease the act of cutting off the shark's fins at sea and throwing the body overboard to fit more fins on the boat. A new study revealed that a new market for shark meat and shark cartilage opened up as a result of the shark finning bans.
Join me as I delve into the conservation efforts surrounding this issue and explore what can be done to protect these apex predators and preserve our oceans.
Article: https://news.mongabay.com/2024/01/global-shark-deaths-increasing-despite-finning-bans-study-shows/
Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program.
Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI
Connect with Speak Up For Blue:
Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf
Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc
Chapters
00:00 Introduction
02:26 Banning shark finning
03:20 Banning the sale of shark fins
06:40 Shark conservation efforts
10:01 Protecting the ocean
In this episode of Ocean Talk, the host discusses the devastating findings of a new scientific study that reveals the ineffectiveness of shark finning regulations in reducing shark mortality over 10 years. The host expresses deep disappointment and proceeds to explore the reasons behind this lack of success.
One of the main challenges highlighted in the episode is the difficulty of enforcing these regulations. The host acknowledges that while a complete ban on shark fishing could potentially have a significant impact on reducing shark mortality, it is unlikely to happen due to the economic dependence on shark fishing in many regions. Enforcing bans would require a substantial increase in resources and efforts to effectively police the vast expanse of the ocean.
Furthermore, the episode emphasizes the ongoing demand for shark products, particularly fins, which perpetuates the pressure on shark fishing. The host mentions that as long as there is a demand for sharks, whether for their fins or other purposes, there will always be a motivation for fishers to continue targeting them. This demand-driven market makes it difficult to effectively regulate or ban shark fishing.
The episode also highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to shark conservation. The host points out that focusing solely on banning shark finning is not sufficient to address the issue of shark mortality. Researchers and policymakers have been advocating for more comprehensive measures that put pressure on shark fisheries management as a whole. This approach recognizes the complexity of the issue and the need to address all aspects of shark fishing to achieve meaningful conservation outcomes.
In summary, the episode discusses the disappointing findings of a study indicating that shark finning regulations did not effectively decrease shark mortality over a 10-year period. The challenges of enforcement, the ongoing demand for shark products, and the need for a comprehensive approach to shark conservation are highlighted as key factors contributing to this lack of success.
The public became aware of the brutal act of shark finning through the release of documentaries called Shark Water. These documentaries exposed the shark finning industry to the public, highlighting its devastating effects on shark populations and the ocean ecosystem. As a result, numerous organizations were formed with the sole purpose of banning shark finning. These organizations, ranging from small grassroots initiatives to larger groups, aimed to raise awareness about the issue and advocate for the implementation of regulations and bans on shark finning. The hope was that by banning shark finning, millions of sharks could be saved from unnecessary deaths each year. The creation of these organizations was a direct response to the public's newfound knowledge about the destructive practice of shark finning.
